No. Napalm is the name given to any of a number of flammable liquids used in warfare, often jellied gasoline (as by Wikipedia's definition). A chemical weapon is one that does not cause physical damage from blast or fire. Instead it releases a chemical agent that is harmful to humans.
Napalm is a petroleum fire (GI's in Vietnam called it a gasoline fire); so it is both, if one wishes to call petroleum a chemical.
A chemical burn. Strong acids and strong bases both cause chemical burns.
She rubbed her face with ashes from the fire that contain lye which is a very corrosive chemical that can cause skin burns.
Third degree burns cause blistered skin. It can also cause chared skin.
Because of the chemical energy stored in the nut, the heat burns it and as the chemical energy burns out, the fire on the nut will start to burn out.
A physical and Chemical change.
During the war, US policy was: 1. First strike with atomic weapons 2. Will retaliate with chemical weapons, if the enemy uses them first 3. Will never use biological weapons Napalm is a fire weapon. Napalm came under heavy public attack during/since Vietnam. Fire weapons are not new; in WWII, the German city of Dresden was firebombed by allied bombers. Napalm today is frowned upon by all the peoples (because of images of Vietnam); but their are other forms of fire weapons that are equal to Napalm that can be used by the military if needed.
A chemical property describing something that burns or catches on fire easily is flammable.
YES, but it's better to say that substances burn, causing fire.
Nuclear. Napalm is simply gelled gasoline fire bomb.
Fire + Oil
gasoline
Petroleum jelly.