The short answer is that the United States Constitution is the law of the land, and any law, including state law, that is not consistent with the US Constitution is superseded by the US Constitution.
There is something called the Supremacy Clause, which means that all inconsistencies between federal and state law must be resolved in favor of federal law, but then the lawyers and courts argue whether the federal law in question was intended to supersede and preempt, or to just add to state law. Is the state law really and truly inconsistent, or just a little. :)
If state law says you can manufacture WIDGET A, for example, and federal law says you cannot, then federal law will control, because that is a direct conflict. But if state law says you can manufacture Widget A, and federal law says you can manufacture Widgets A, B and C, but you must comply with certain requirements, or you must manufacture them all together but not individually, then state law is not superseded...it is just ... clarified a bit, if you get my meaning.
Not quite... federal law is federal law and is in addition to state law, except where there is a state and federal law that are virtually identical, in which case the federal law may "supersede" the state law -- this is the constitutional principle of federal "supremacy". On the other hand yes federal law applies in every state, but remains federal law. And do local law enforcement officials have the right to arrest and ticket you for violation of certain Federal Laws, yes.
State law cannot contradict federal law because the Constitution states that federal law has power over state law.
law enforcement, state standards, federal laws
If the state laws had more power than Federal Laws the Constitution would have little to no power.
If the state laws had more power than Federal Laws the Constitution would have little to no power.
Only when a state tries to use a power specifically defined for the federal government under the constitution
No. Federal law always out trumps state law.
In the Constitution, it states that Federal law was supreme over State law. Therefore, the power for a state to nullify a federal law would go against the Constitution.
If the state laws had more power than federal laws the Constitution would have little to no power.
The Federal level is higher than the State Level. The US Constitution wins over any State law deemed unconstitutional.
State law can be more detailed than federal law, but cannot conflict with federal law. Therefore, a state law cannot determine that a federal law is invalid. The state would have to, instead challenge the federal law as an unconstitutional intrusion on state rights.
supreme court ^O^
Federal law takes precedence over state law.