States cannot overrule laws of the federal government, because the Constitution states in Article VI that the Constitution and the laws of the United States and treaties made under authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land. Thus, state laws that conflict with Federal Laws are invalid. Never the less, there are instances when a state law may "conflict" with a federal law and still be constitutional. These are when federal law confers some type of benefit or protection like a mandatory minimum wage. If a state chooses to grant a higher minimum wage it may do so, because the federal law is setting a minimum standard, not a maximum standard. The federal minimum wage act does not say the states may not set higher minimums. It just prevents them from setting lower ones. In such a case, while it seems as though the state law is in conflict with the federal law, in fact, it is not.
No, federal law supersedes state laws. Federal law is superseded by the US Constitution.
Not in all cases. State law is certainly superceded by the US Constitution (that is, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and no law by any body can contravene it). However, as the Constitution sets out a federal system of government, where certain areas of jurisdiction are reserved for the states, and others for the federal government, it is entirely possible for a state law and a federal law to be in conflict. This conflict is resolved by the U.S. Federal Judiciary system (ultimately, the Supreme Court of the United States [SCOTUS]), with one of three outcomes:
Note that the federal system of the United States is quite unusual in modern governments - very, very few other countries have this particularly complex split of jurisdictional boundaries (Germany is perhaps one of the few). In the vast majority of countries, federal (i.e. national government) law alwayssupercedes that of lower-level governments.
No. The Supremacy Clause (Art. VI, Cl. 2) makes federal law the supreme law of the land.
The text of the clause is:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme
Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
No, states do not have the right to overrule a law. Amendment 10 in the constitution says "the powers not delegated to the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." powers to the states are limited. This is not one of the rights the state government is allowed to have.
Federal law all ready supersede state law. Good example is the recent passage of laws making pot legal. The federal law states that pot is an illegal drug, but states have passed laws making it legal. The federal government can still arrest people for illegal use of pot. As a result cities are passing laws about the sale and growing of pot following federal laws, so making it illegal even though the state has it as legal. This means people using pot can still be arrested.
Yes. Federal law comes before and above any other law until challenged and taken to the supreme court.
Yes, if the law contradicts a federal law or is unconstitutional .
yes they can :)
Federal Laws prevail over state laws because of the supremacy clause listed in the constitution. The Supremacy clause states that the constitution is the supreme law of the land. Therefore, federal laws are greater than state laws.
supremacy clause- federal law ranks supreme over state laws
The Constitution is considered the Supreme Law of the Land, and the national (Federal) government takes precedence over state governments, under Constitutional principles. This does not keep state governments from asserting states' rights, however, and not all Federal laws are enforced throughout the states.
No
Federal laws over-ride any conflicting state or local ordinances.
Which supreme court?There is one Supreme Court of the United States that has appellate (appeals) jurisdiction over cases involving federal laws, treaties and the US Constitution. It hears federal question cases from both the state and federal court systems, but lacks jurisdiction over municipal (city) code, state laws or state constitutional issues unless they are in conflict with federal law or the US Constitution.The US Supreme Court also has original (trial) jurisdiction over disputes between the states.The 50 state supreme courts (or their equivalent; some are named differently) have jurisdiction over city and state laws and state constitutional questions, but some of these cases also involve federal law and US Constitutional issues that the states have authority to hear.Confusing enough? Your school probably wants you to say the US Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the country(United States), but the real answer isn't quite that simple.[Countries other than the United States have different jurisdictional guidelines.]For more information, see Related Questions, below.
If the state laws had more power than federal laws the Constitution would have little to no power.
federal laws take precedence over state laws. Why you all up in my grill? homey g dog yo!
The Federal laws take precedance over any state laws.
None. State and federal law are separate laws. The federal is over the state law in all cases. That is why cases are heard in the Supreme Court to decide if a state law meets the requirements of the federal consitution. The constitution of the United States is the foundation for all government and law.
A State felony is from a law passed by the State legislature. A federal felony is from a law passed by the U.S. Congress. Federal laws take precedence over State laws.
The supreme court is the court of last resort in the federal legal system and federal courts can overrule state courts. The Supreme Courts also settles disputes between states,such as the location of state borders .