A governor cannot veto an earmark if that earmark is legislation passed by Congress. If the earmark is proposed by that governor's state legislature, then the governor can veto it. However, if the earmark is a state one and if the state legislature passes the earmark over the governor's veto, then there is no further veto power. (The following addendum has been added by a WA Supervisor) ==Addendum== Readers should understand that inflammatory questions such as this may be intended to promote false, misleading, or otherwise malicious information about the various candidates. Anyone searching for information on a candidate's background or history should research other sources rather than depending on the opinions of individuals and/or links to various other websites purported to provide "factual" information.
Yes, although the more proper term is "line-item" veto (also called "partial veto"). It allows an executive (such as a president or governor) to nullify particular portions of a bill without vetoing it in its entirety.
Line-item vetoes are allowed for the governors of 44 of the 50 U.S. states, excluding Indiana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Vermont.
Beginning in 1996, the U.S. president had this power; a federal court decision in 1998 nullified the president's line-item veto capabilities, though.
Maybe. It depends on the particular state you're talking about. Some states give governors that power, but not all of them do.
the answer is that the Governor DOES HAVE the power to select individual items and veto them.
The line item veto in an appropriations t bill is the power you have in mind. Such a power lets the governor strike single items without vetoing the whole bill. Without such power, the legislature can pass a bill that contains necessary expenditures along with useless "pork" and the governor either has to allow the useless expenses or else veto something that the state must have have .
The power of a president, governor, or other elected executive to reject individual provisions of a bill.
The bill evidence of law that establishes by appropriation symbol the individual amounts appropriated by Congress is the Congressional Appropriations Bill. This bill includes the statutory language that sets the individual spending limits for the fiscal year. It specifies the purpose for which the funds can be used and the amount allotted for each purpose. This bill must be passed in both the House and Senate and then signed by the President before it becomes law. The appropriation symbol is used to identify the individual amounts appropriated for each purpose. The Congressional Appropriations Bill sets the individual spending limits for the fiscal year. It specifies the purpose for which the funds can be used and the amount allotted for each purpose. The bill must be passed in both the House and Senate and then signed by the President before it becomes law. The appropriation symbol is used to identify the individual amounts appropriated for each purpose.Overall the Congressional Appropriations Bill is the bill evidence of law that establishes by appropriation symbol the individual amounts appropriated by Congress.
A bill containing many miscellaneous provisions and appropriations is called an omnibus bill.
An appropriations bill.
appropriations bill
An appropriations bill.
The Governor of the State of Illinois signs bills that the Illinois State Legislature passes into law.
in what ways does the Bill of Rights protect individuals from the power of government
the 1999 Omnibus Appropriations bill and the 2000 Agriculture Appropriations bill made interest free loans available to mohair producers once again.
A temporary law that Congress passes when an appropriations bill has not been decided by the beginning of the fiscal year is a continuing resolution.
Yes, because the line-item veto is the power of the Texas governor to reject only some provisions of a spending bill.