DIVERGENT VIEWS
Answer
Yes. A Supreme Court Justice is placed in office for life and no one can hold them accountable for the decisions they make. We have term limitations in the Executive Branch. Legislative branch members must be re-elected but the Supreme Court Judges are there for life.
Answer
Whether the Supreme Court is too powerful is always been a hot topic. However, take into consideration that the Court's job is to first and foremost interpret the constitution. If, as the person above suggests, we elect Justices, the interpretation of the constitution would become too political. The founders wanted to safeguard the Constitution and put in Justices for life terms.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court really only has power to the extent that the other 2 branches of government abide by its rulings. After all, the Supreme Court doesn't have an army or police force with which it can enforce its rulings. Of course, if Congress or the executive branch decided to flout a Supreme Court ruling, they would basically be saying that the constitution has become irrelevant, and then we'd have far bigger problems than an academic debate over the extent of the Supreme Court's power.
Answer
No.
It does the job it is set up to do, and that job only. The only way you could possibly decrease the power it has is by creating a further court above it. But the same thing happens: a higher court will always have more power than the lower court, so you could only shift the power to a different place, never take it away.
Moreover, that would lower the impact of justice, since someone could always appeal the decision regardless of how many courts had agreed on the verdict.
The US Supreme Court is so powerful because this is the highest court in the land. This court interprets the Constitution, and many decisions made here affect decision-making in courts throughout the United States.
There are those that would say that the Supreme Court in Canada, being an unelected body, infringes on the power of the legitimate government that we have elected, but this is only an opinion. The judicial branch of government actually plays an important role in balancing the power of the executive and legislative branches of government, and therefore incredibly important to a democratic society. For more on this topic you should read "The Judicial Role in a Democratic State" by Justice Rosalie Abella.
No. The US Supreme Court is the most powerful court in the United States. Each country has a supreme or high court that is most powerful in its own jurisdiction (area where it has authority to hear cases). The US Supreme Court has no authority over other countries.
The consequences of attempting to increase the size of the supreme court was that the government would have to much power in the congress.
The consequences of attempting to increase the size of the supreme court was that the government would have to much power in the congress.
The Supreme Court's and lower courts' primary power is judicial review, the ability of a court to evaluate laws or executive orders relevant to cases before the court to determine whether they are constitutional. The US Supreme Court is the ultimate authority on constitutional interpretation and can nullify an unconstitutional law, rendering it unenforceable.
Thjre are 25 Court Rooms in the Supreme Court of India.
There is only one United States Supreme Court, but there are also State Supreme Courts. So, to answer your question: none. The U.S. Supreme Court is it's own court.
Schools have whatever power they need to hold peace. Though, over the years, that power has been challenge by several Supreme Court cases.
to keep one branch of government from having too much power
to keep one branch of government from having too much power
that's a statement, but no they are not. The president has much more consolidated power in one person.
The salary of a Supreme Court Chief Justice in the Philippines as of 2013 is 40,000 Pesos.
that would be correct
Arguably, the justices of the Supreme Court and other courts wield too much power. An interpretation of the law can essentially become a law in itself.