the last two
For photographs to be admissible in court, they need to be both legal and relevant to the case. Legal material refers to whether the photographs were obtained lawfully without violating any privacy rights or laws. Relevance ensures that the photographs have probative value in helping to prove or disprove a fact in the case.
Yes, palm prints can be admissible in court as evidence. Palm prints can be used to identify individuals just like fingerprints. The admissibility of palm print evidence will depend on the circumstances of the case and the rules of evidence in the jurisdiction.
The common law doctrine known as the "Ferreira Rule" allows for evidence from bloodhounds to be admissible in American courts. Bloodhound evidence is typically used in tracking and search operations to assist in identifying suspects or locating missing persons.
No, a signed confession does not have to be notarized for it to be admissible in court. The signature itself is typically sufficient to establish the authenticity of the confession.
In some jurisdictions, a dying declaration is admissible in court even if the person does not die. The testimony can be admitted if the declarant is unavailable to testify due to being physically or mentally incapacitated. However, the reliability and credibility of the statement would still be assessed by the court.
Voice prints, also known as voice authentication or speaker recognition, can be admissible in court as evidence if certain criteria are met. This includes using reliable methods to generate voice prints and having experts testify to their accuracy and reliability. However, the decision to admit voice prints as evidence ultimately rests with the judge overseeing the case.
AA meetings can be admissible in court. If they are court ordered or relevant to an issue or evidence, then it usually is admissible.
Yes. If it is relevant to an issue and meets the other evidence rules, it is admissible.
yes, as long as it's relevant to the case.
Your mode of dress is not admissible in court. The evidence cries to be admissible, your honor!
No
Hearsay
Relevant evidence is information that has a tendency to prove or disprove a fact in question. It is important in legal proceedings as it directly relates to the issues being discussed and is admissible in court to help determine the outcome of a case.
The evidence was not admissible in court due to it having no relevance to the proceedings.
no
Yes, faxes can be used in court. Emails, post-its, and other types of documents are admissible as well.
In a court of law the only evidence that can be admissible must be gotten legally.
yes, in certain circumstances if you are one of the involved parties in conversation , you can record the conversation and it is admissible in court