answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

For Appeasement

Britain had no allies in 1938 - no country would join Britain to help fight Nazis.

Gave Britain time to re-arm.

Many considered Chamberlain to be correct as another war was to be avoided at all costs.

A strong Germany could fight communism. Edit: true but are Britain and France communists.

The people in Britain realized that the treaty of Versailles was too harsh.

Also they thought that German people (Sudetenland) were to be governed by Germany even though the Treaty said otherwise.

People wanted to avoid war.

It also gave us time to build up our armed forces, as well as the Germans so that we could deal with the threat more effectively.

Against Appeasement

Gave Germany time to strengthen their armed forces.

If Britain and France would not intervene over Czechosovakia, unlikely they would take any action to defend other threatened countries.

Naive policy - Hitler had made clear his aims to conquer Eastern Europe.

Hitler became more aggressive as he felt Britain would not take action.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

One problem is that appeasement never ends. For example, when Neville Chamberlain decided to appease Adolph Hitler, the idea was that it would lead to peace because Hitler would (supposedly) be satisfied with the compromise that had been offered to him. But as we know, Hitler was far from satisfied. And that is what often happens: the person (or persons) being appeased usually decide they want more. Appeasement is often seen as a sign of weakness, and it seldom gets the desired result, since the stronger party will usually come back to the weaker one with even more demands.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

1. would be failing to stop Hitler and Germany would grow stronger

2. Stalin became suspicious of G. Britain and France

3. the allies were letting countries be taken over easily, free of fighting

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

For:

thought it would secure peace avoiding another war

give time to re-arm (Britain)

believed Stalin and communist were the big threat

Against:

Failing to stop Hitler gain more power and strength to germany

stalin became supicious of Britain and France

allies let many countries be taken over easy with no fighting.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Give three arguments for appeasement and three atguments against appeasement?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are the three arguments for and against Independence?

Three main arguments for independence is:They wouldn't be under the rein of the king.No slavesStopping the British from putting taxes on the colonists.Three main arguments against independence is:Fear of losing the war.Not being ready for indepence.Didnt think they would have enough men to fight in the war.


Explain three 3 world arguments for birth control and two 2 world arguments against birth control?

Religion, Morals, and health


What is discussion text?

Discussion text is used to present information and arguments from different perspectives or viewpoints. A discussion text typically has three components that are the issue, arguments for or against, and a recommendation or conclusion.


Is three cups of tea a fake?

'60 Minutes' has plausible arguments against Greg Mortenson, but it is as of yet unknown whether Mortenson is guilty.


What are three arguments against globalization?

One argument against globalization is that their is more disparity of wealth now. Other arguments against globalization are that the economics of other countries can affect America and countries can lose jobs when other countries will do the work for less.


How many arguments that fgets function requires?

Three.


How many arguments does a debate consist of?

Three or less.


How many arguments does the COUNT IF function contain?

three parts


What three arguments form the basis for arguments from revelation?

(1) that the Bible is consistent with itself (2) that the Bible corresponds with reality (3) that the Bible's claims can be scientifically demonstrated


What three arguments form the basis for the arguments from revelation?

(1) that The Bible is consistent with itself (2) that the Bible corresponds with reality (3) that the Bible's claims can be scientifically demonstrated


What were three reasons European leaders agreed to a policy of appeasement?

The European leaders agreed to a policy of appeasement because France and Britain had adopted the stance of achieving peace at any price. Neither country was ready for war and there was British sentiment that Germany did have some grievances from Versailles.


What is the cannon-bard theory?

The Cannon-Bard theory of emotion argues that emotional responses occur simultaneously with physical reactions in response to a stimulus. This theory proposes that the brain processes emotions independently from physiological responses, rather than the physiological changes causing emotions.