They are not just possible, they are an inevitable consequence of a Universe dominated by gravity.
No
neutron stars and black holes
it is theorized that it is possible for black holes to act as worm holes but most scientists believe their gravitational pull is simply too powerful for anything to survive being ripped to pieces before it goes anywhere.
The nearest known black hole is at a distance of about 6000 light-years, but it is quite possible that there are black holes closer to us.
Not necessarily. It is likely possible for a black hole to be ejected from its host galaxy during a galactic collision.
stellar black holes were stars (these are large)primordial black holes were pieces of the big bang (these are microscopic)
No. It certainly has black holes, but it has other things as well.No. It certainly has black holes, but it has other things as well.No. It certainly has black holes, but it has other things as well.No. It certainly has black holes, but it has other things as well.
Black holes do not die but they can evaporate.
The only known mechanism to produce a black hole is the gravitational collapse of an object that has at least 2-3 times the mass of our Sun. However, it is considered possible that the enormous densities right after the Big Bang may have resulted in some black holes; for more information, read about "primordial black holes".
not completely sure, but from what we know stars are suns and each has their own solar system, just like ours. so does the sun get it's fuel from black holes?
In theory, yes. If you put enough antimatter in, you could in theory annihilate a black hole. Also, one could throw tons of particles that would change it's momentum so it stops spinning. Neither of these is possible for humanity. Also, there is absolutely no reason to destroy black holes. <><><><><> It is theorized that black holes hold galaxies together, so destroying one seems like a very bad idea, even if it were possible.
its an unknown fact but if met its possible it could join and grow or blow.