Digital Cameras are more efficient than film cameras in many ways. With digital cameras, you don't have to get all of you photos printed. You just print the ones you want. Another great feature is you don't have to wait to see your pictures. The screen on the back displays as soon as you take them.
You can take a lot more photos on a digital camera at a time than you can on a film camera. Film cameras average about 27 shots per roll where as digital cameras average 265 on a memory card.
Digital Cameras look almost like Film Cameras, only Digital Cameras are more "Computerized" and don't use film. Digital Cameras have an Addition from Aperture, Shutter Speed, and ISO, they have Mega Pixels which tell you what quality the photos come out as. Lower MP say 1.2MP is mostly used in cheaper Digital Cameras or web cameras, more expensive cameras can go up to 12.5MP or more, Digital Cameras also have an LCD Display so you can view photos instantly. The difference between Film and Digital is that with film once you take a photo its permanent on the film, Digital Cameras enable you to reuse the Memory card since you are able to delete photos. Look at the website dpreview
No. Although film cameras are nice when sending a child to camp or on a feild trip, Digital cameras are not only cheaper to develope but there are more places that you can develope them
The prices of digital cameras change because people are becoming more and more "electronically correct", so to speak. They have come up with a lot more ways to make the cameras more efficient, and it costs money to run the tests, and the cameras become more valuable, which overall, causing the prices of cameras to go up. They may sometimes go down though, since the store is trying to get rid of it, or maybe because they are running a sale. They might simply be no longer as efficient as other newer-made cameras.
Kodak is a better camera brand. Kodak invented film and resisted becoming a digital camera brand because it didn't want digital cameras to overcome film cameras. The creators of film automatically says that their cameras (digital or film) are the best. Kodak has been around longer and has obviously had much more experience. Now you do the math, creators of film, longer existence, and more experience. which is better, Kodak or Nikon? Kodak by far!
It depends on the camera type. For inexpensive "point & shoot" cameras, the main difference is that a film camera takes the picture immediately when you press the button. On some digital cameras, especially the older ones, there is a delay, sometimes up to a second or more, between pressing the button and the camera taking the picture. With the more expensive SLR cameras, there is no difference in shutter response time between film and digital cameras. Most digital SLR's can take multiple pictures as rapidly as a film camera with a motor drive.
well this depends on if your referring to Film Cameras as the old cameras or if your referring to older Digital Cameras the difference between Film and Digital cameras is that with Digital Cameras your able to have the image processed immediately after shooting and can have it viewed on an LCD Display meaning you waist less money waisting Film or having to buy Chemicals, another upper hand with using Digital is that you can fit more Photographs in a Memory Card compared to a 100ft roll of Bulk Film, maximum being only around 140 frames per 100ft compared to thousands on an 8GB SDHC Memory card on a 10MP Camera. The down side to Digital is that it can be much more confusing to use compared to a Film SLR Camera where with Film Cameras you have dials for controlling how the frame should be exposed as for Digital many cameras can take a while to prepare (White Balance, ISO, etc) and some Digital Cameras can have Lag time due to the time it takes for it to Focus (when on Auto Focus) another problem with Digital is that it requires a Battery/'s to work as for Film Cameras many run using Mechanical Shutter and not Electromagnetic (meaning it does not use any power source)
No, film single lens reflex (SLR) cameras exist, albeit obsolete. Currently all commercial single lens reflex cameras are digital, however, it may be possible to find a retailer or more likely, a private seller in possession of a functional film SLR camera.
No. You cannot economically convert a film camera to a digital camera. The digital system is very different and fitting it to an existing film camera is more expensive than buying a new digital camera. Some of the more expensive professional cameras can change between film and digital backs replacing the film transport with digital technology. The replacement backing includes all the electronics and controls typical of a digital camera of that caliber.
Film cameras need the actual literal film while digital cameras need the memory. So basically you can take a lot more pictures with a digital camera compared to one roll of film camera. - - - - - You don't NEED to send digital camera photos to a lab to be processed, unless you want prints and then you really should--they make inkjet printers for photos but it's actually cheaper to send them off plus they'll look better if you do. Film has to be developed. You can use film one time. Digital memory cards can be erased and reused, which is not necessarily a good thing--I know I've thrown away files I wish I hadn't. Film can be enlarged much more than digital.
digital cameras --------------------------------------- Zooms have been around a Lot longer than digital cameras, but it wasn't until the mid '70's that computers were used to help design them, making them more affordable and efficient (smaller)
When considering a camera trade in for a new digital camera, old analog cameras should not be overlooked as a trade in option. There are many analog cameras that are actually just as valuable, if not more so, than certain digital cameras. In particular, SLR cameras, cameras that have matching lens attachments, and cameras that can accept wide format film or high speed film are all still in use professionally and could be very valuable.
Yes because before they only used film cameras and after the digital camera was invented, people could take more pictures. The film camera can only take about 28 pictures.
the ability to view and delete photos directly from the camera some/most can film video some/most are smaller digital cameras are more economical to use
some of them are Kodak, Canon, Fujifilm, Samsung, Jazz, Sony, Nikon, and there are many more. and for some Film Cameras Miranda, Sanyo, and all of the above but Jazz
There are two basic types, consumer cameras and DSLR cameras, which are meant more for professionals.
The better brands for digital cameras are Nikon, Canon, Fuji, Olympus. There are more expensive cameras available from companies like Hasselblad
There are a number of advantages to a digital camera. The greatest advantage is probably the delete button. You have the ability to erase any photos that don't turn out. The price is another advantage. Long-term, digital will save a lot of money. Digital cameras also tend to have a lot more function options, and you can also edit the pictures yourself on the computer before printing.
Yes. Most digital cameras come installed with a zoom lens. Basic cameras, such as those for beginning photographers, generally do not have interchangeable lenses. A digital camera with an interchangeable lens will cost more.
Good reviews about the Canon digital cameras can be found by reading the reviews for individual Canon cameras on Amazon and Bestbuy. More reviews can be found at Cnet.
Pros of digital camerasdigital images can be seen immediately after taking the picture through the small monitor on the back of a cameradigital film (cards, storage devices) can be re-used almost indefinitely, so you do not have to continually buy more cards to take more picturesdigital cameras can handle a wider range of lighting conditions than film handlesdigital cards can generally hold more images than a roll of filmdigital information does not decay with time and does not degrade when copieddigital images do not require processing for viewingdigital images can easily be manipulated on a computer without being scanned firstdigital images can be mailed and shared with others who live far away through image sharing web sitesnewer digital cameras offer more features for the same price, or cost less for the same features than older digital camerasdigital "film" (cards) can be changed in broad daylightCons of digital camerasdigital cameras require electricity to operatedigital cameras can be more expensive than film camerasall digital cameras quickly become obsolete or outdatedthe digital camera you buy today can become outdated within 12 monthswhen you buy a better digital camera, you often have to upgrade digital cards and the computer you store your files on, which can be expensivedigital cameras create files that are relatively largehi-resolution digital images have very high file sizes, requiring large digital storage devicesdigital cameras require special storage cards to hold digital image filesdigital camera files must be downloaded to a computer and most computers are not inexpensivesome digital storage devices are subject to failure, causing a loss of stored imagessome people prefer to print digital images on paper, which requires a printer, ink and paper, all of which can become expensivetaking pictures in low-light conditions results in digital noise that can be difficult, or impossible to get rid ofdigital cameras with removable lenses can get dust on the sensor, resulting in a spot on every image taken with that camera - this can be expensive to have cleaned, or dangerous to clean by yourselfdigital cards can become corrupt, causing you to lose imagesless expensive digital cameras may have a lower dynamic range, leading to lower quality imagesPros of filmfilm cameras made 50 years ago can still make photographs todayfilm cameras do not have to require electricity to operate - though many dofilm does not require electricity for exposurefilm can be used in any film camera designed for the same format, that is, a roll of 35mm film can be used in a 35mm camera made today or a camera made decades ago and still create usable imagesgrayscale images can last for decades and do not require computers for viewingfilm is not affected by magnetic or electro-magnetic fieldsdeveloped film does not have to be stored in the darklarge film negatives can deliver higher resolution than is available from any current digital cameralarge polaroid cameras can create photographic prints with no visible dot patternold film negatives can be reprinted at any time - there is no reliance on a specific software program or computer operating systemdigital noise is not present in film negativesprints from film negatives can deliver a subtle range of tones and detail that is still not matched by current digital printing methodscheap film cameras take pictures with the same dynamic range as expensive cameras because that range is within the film, not the cameraCons of filmfilm must loaded into cameras and developed in light-tight conditionsspecial chemicals are required for developing film and for developing prints made from film negativessome of these chemicals can be toxic and should be handled with carethere are fewer commercial labs that can process exposed film and return negatives along with printsthis drives up the cost of developing and printing film-based imagesthe number of images that can be captured on a roll of film is limited by the length of the film roll and the size of the images exposed on that film35mm film typically comes in 24 and 36 exposure lengthsimages captured on film must be developed before an image can be seenmost people also prefer that a print be made from the film negative for viewingonly the polaroid process allowed immediate (within about 60 seconds) viewing of a photographfilm negatives or final prints must be scanned prior to computer manipulationsome color prints can fade over timeloading film into a camera can be awkwardmost types of film are limited to a specific range of sensitivity (a single ASA value)most film developed for low-light conditions tends to be very grainyCommon among all camerasbetter quality lenses will create better quality imagescheap lenses will create poor quality images"pushing" the limits of the range of lighting the camera (and film or digital card) was designed for will result in noisy images - in other words, shooting in very low light generally results in grainy images with very little detailthere is a practical upper limit as to how large the image can be made before there is serious degradation - either pixels or film grain will begin to obscure the imageit is the skill and vision of the photographer not the camera, that determines the quality of the images created with the camerastrong back-lighting can lead to an under-exposed main imagethe camera cannot see in the dark as well as you can
The Canon EOS is a professional digital SLR camera. SLR cameras offer the user the range of options in terms of lenses, flashes, etc. that a regular film camera accepts. This ability for customization combined with the way it captures the image, which is more true to a film camera than other digital cameras, account of the price.
Film and Digital Cameras are very different but share the same basics, the difference between Digital and Film is that with Film you can expect better quality photos then Digital cameras, Film cameras can be expected to last longer then Digital Cameras, and since Film Cameras haven't changed since the 1960's you dont need to upgrade every year on a new $500-$2000 DSLR and when the lenses you already have dont work on your new $2000 DSLR? well you could spend another $2000 to $3000 on new lenses and accessories, or you could stick with your Film Camera for the next 30 to 40 years before needing a new Film Camera, also Film works much better because if you own multiple Film Cameras, you dont need to learn how to use it since they all share the same design basics, but if you dont like to wait for film to process (taking it to a Photo Lab only takes an hour) then Digital might be your choice but face the problem of spending thousands on new Camera Bodys every year, also Digital Cameras arnt as well made as Film CamerasFilmPro's: better Quality of photos, Better build quality of the Body, Longer life, wider choice of effects, its own unique Photograph looks, easier to use if using more then oneCons: longer time to process the film (inless its Instant Print(Polaroid))DigitalPro's: faster time processing photos, able to view photos instantly, camera-to-computer processingCons: more expensive due to need to upgrade to newer DSLR's, requires power to function, harder to set up the Camera (White Balance, Color effects, etc), harder when switching from one DSLR to another of a different brandDiscover more at:Camera StoreAdelaide, SAPhone: 1800 155 067
You can take many more pictures before needing to change the storage medium. You can immediately see the results of your work. You can discard poor images before processing. Your expenses are far less, since there is no need to develop film, print pictures, mail film for processing or wait for it to be returned! Memory cards are far smaller than roll film, so you can carry many more! You can get much higher resolution images for much less money. The biggest disadvantage of digital cameras is that film cameras generally have a wide range of lenses and accessories, not currently available for digital cameras...although that is changing rapidly!
The Sony Digital Cameras with the best reviews include the Sony CyberShot RX100, the Sony Alpha A77 and the Sony Nex-5n. More reviews for Sony Digital Cameras can be found on the Trusted Reviews Website.
You will find all about small digital cameras online. First of all pick a brand you would like to learn more about.