answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The carbon atom, as having 4 valence electrons, can form 4 single covalent bound at a time. There are many ways to do this, the easiest example is methane, with a structure of CH4, where the four hydrogen atoms are connected to the carbon atom by one sigle covalent bound. Practically there are infinite materials what have a four single covalent bounded carbon atom. It can form a single bound with practicially every atom what can accept a single bound.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How can carbon bonb covalently with four other atoms?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Natural Sciences
Related questions

How many atoms can hydrogen bonb with oxygen?

2


What are 2 major religious holidays in Netherlands?

goat bonb


What was the second city to be levelled by a plutonium based atomic bonb?

The first was Nagasaki, the second fortunately don't exist.


How do you spell bonb?

The correct spelling is "bomb". A bomb is an explosive weapon that is used for destruction or to create a loud noise.


How do you make the stink bonb in poptropica in big nate?

go to the science lab in the school. click on the beaker. then mix all colors.


Did kids help make the atomic bonb?

No. The men involved with the Manhattan project were scientists and worked many years on the development of the bomb. Einstein was one of the men.


Why were some military leaders against the atomic bonb?

Many were against it even its creator Albert Einstein was against it because it was unethical and that type of immense power was unknow till then. They were scared but i believe it had to be done


What is the one reason that the atomic bomb is against being used?

the atomic bonb is to powerful to use it will kill many people we may only use it in importand and good ways! from the one and only meatbabie


Are there any Pros to the atomic bonb If so what are they?

The pros and cons of the atomic bomb are greatly debated. Some say that there were less U.S. casualties because of the bomb, which ended the war quickly. It would also make us look powerful and mighty. Without the bomb, we would look defenseless. So much money was spent to research and build the bombs that we figured that we might as well use them, or it would look like we were just wasting money. On the other hand, innocent civilians' lives would be lost, the power and potential of the full-scale bomb is truly unknown. The bomb would give the U.S. a savage and immoral image, and would leave great devastation in the affected country, giving us a bad reputation, possibly causing the opposite of the wanted effect. It could cause a larger war involving more countries.


Did Jeff hardy win the WWE championship at armogedon 2008?

wat happened was triple h hit edge with a pedigree than wen he was pinning edge, Jeff did a swanton bonb to edge to pick up the win and his first ever WWE Championship. he lost it a month later at the Royal Rumble 2009 wen his brother Matt hit Jeff with a chair to let edge pin him. I was actually at ARMAGGEDDON 2008, so i should know wat happened!


Why do many people still argue about dicisions to drop atomic bonb on Japan in 1945?

After the attack on Japan many military we given an opportunity to observe an atomic bomb explosion. Apparently the event was awe inspiring enough (You could see the flash even if you turned away as the light would penetrate your skull to the eyes through the back of your head) that many generals aid "I'd never ever use such a weapon!"Todays generals and leaders have never been up close and personal with that much destruction and think "It is just big bomb - we can use it!" Politicians and generals are too feeble minded to see the reasons for a no nukes policy. Without demonstrations the best we can do id show what happened the last time.