If the law is passed by votes of fewer than 2/3 of Congress, he can simply refuse to sign it into law, that is, veto it.
Yes.
I think the president is also called the chief executive though I am not 100 percent sure.... Don't blame me if that's wrong!!!!! Laurance
In 1964 Congress passed a new Civil Rights Act, designed to prohibit segregation.
They passed the turkey and mashed potatoes when they were eating with the pilgrims
The purpose of the judicial branch is to stop unconstitutional laws passed by the Legislative branch from enforcement by the Executive branch. An unconstitutional law is any law that the Constitution did not give the Congress the power to enact legislation about.
The executive branch has the power to veto a bill, preventing it from becoming law. In the United States, this authority is held by the President, who can reject legislation passed by Congress. However, Congress can override a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Yes, veto power allows the president to reject legislation passed by Congress, effectively stopping it from becoming law. However, Congress can override a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, allowing the law to take effect despite the president's objections. This system of checks and balances ensures that the president's veto is not absolute, promoting collaboration between the executive and legislative branches.
Other branches can stop things that congress wants to happen by using the powers that certain branch has.
so the don't kill everybody
congress passed the embargo act
Congress can override an executive order by the President if they have a 2/3 majority vote. They can also pass legislation that won't allow funding for whatever the President wants to do. This keeps our government from becoming a dictatorship.
It doesn't. The president or congress could ignore them to their hearts content, and the court would have no way to stop them.