Nuclear energy is a non-renewable source since there is a very tiny amount of Uranium-235, whose fission results in nuclear energy. If a more abundant element could be used in nuclear reactors, such as, say, nitrogen or oxygen, it would effectively become inexhaustible. However, current technology does not allow for this since these atoms are too small to be accurately and repetitively bombarded (which is a key part of the fission process).
Minerals are a nonrenewable resource.
renewable
wind is a nonrenewable resourceyet air is a inexhaustible resourceI'll let you figure out the rest why.
no coal is not an inexhaustible resource
It is a nonrenewable resource.
Theoretically it is non-renewable. In practical terms it is almost inexhaustible. IF we could fuse hydrogen isotopes economically
Natural as, methane (CH4), is non-renewable. It is one of the fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas).
Potential energy is not a resource, therefore it is neither. Look up the definition for potential energy and it may help you more.
Coal is a nonrenewable resource because there is only so much coal in the ground, and when you dig it all out, there is no more. However, the quantity of coal that is available is very large. It is not running out soon.
It can be a Inexhaustible Resource by never running out like the sun,water and wind
Sandstone is a non-renewable resource because once we use it all up we cannot make more of it.
its not a nonrenewable resource because its a renewable resource