Hitler had the most modern military in the world in 1939, which had been tested and honed during the Spanish Civil War in 1936. While most European nations were still flying biplanes, the Luftewafe was flying aircraft capable of over 200 miles per hour, armed with 20mm canon. The Tiger tank was unequaled until late in the war. The German 88mm artillary gun was effective as a tank gun, anti-aircraft weapon, and field artillary. Also, Hitler did not fight the way that European military leaders had fought for over a century. He bypassed the Maginot Line of France, a heavily fortified defense built specifically to stop German troops from invading France, by invading the supposedly neutral Low Countries. The Blitzkreig was a combined armoured, paratrooper, and air assault, which overwhelmed the antiquated defenses of its targets.
Adolph Hitler's first six years in power resulted in rapid economic recovery from the Great Depression, and the denunciation of restrictions imposed on Germany after World War I. He oversaw annexation of territories that were home to millions of ethnic Germans. All these actions brought him popular support.
Military aggression coupled with modern technology & leadership of the Prussian military class. The Blitzkreig appeared irresistable, it was devastating and demoralising. But, and this is the point, it was based, to a great extent, on bluff. By & large, for example, Rommel (yes, I know he's a Wurttemberger) fought against forces far larger than his own in North Africa. And it does need saying that at no time is Hitler a 'General', he is not a great commander, but he uses, & then discards, the talent of others. Undeniably the Wehrmacht was, however, a formidable force and aided by modern weaponry & tactics it gave the Germans the means to wage war as never seen before, with terrifying results. It is also noticable with the Luftwaffe & Kreigsmarine, as well as the Panzer forces, all the material is fresh from the drawing board, it's all brand new & up to date, there is no residue from previous times, (Some ships of the Royal Navy are, for example, decidedly WW1 vintage) and its performance in warfare is, generally unquestioned. The Graf Spee, off South America in 1939, had fought the 3 cruisers it opposed and was scuttled by its crew largely as a result of British disinformation. For once the Germans were outbluffed.
Hitler was not a success, in fact he was miserable failure. After WW1 the treaty of Versailles imposed restrictions on Germany that severely inhibited its ability to recover its economy,military, and standing in the world. Unemployment was high, people were angry, and communism was moving in. This set the stage for a nationalistic movement aimed to restore pride and Germany's standing in the world.Hitlers ability to speak and inspire the masses was his true genius. His theatrics, grandstanding and tension filled speeches often brought crowds from tears to ecstasy. When Hitler took power the treaty of Versailles was ignored and he began to rebuild the military. This act created industry and jobs, unemployment dropped, morale soared. In Hitler people found their savior and would follow him anywhere at whatever the cost. Hitlers vision of a "Reich that would last a thousand years", left Germany worse than when he took power. At one point his own military commanders conspired to kill him due to his poor decisions.In the end while the bombs were dropping and Germany was crumbling Hitler hiding in his bunker took his own life. I would hardly call that successful leadership.
When one person has power and makes something sound good people usually follow. He made it sound as if being a Nazi was the thing to do and if you werent one, well then you are the lowest of the low.
Hitler was successful with invading Poland, France, Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands and Luxembourg because he tricked them into signing neutrality documents with nonaggression pacts. He had absolutely no intention of honoring those pacts. He tricked them then invaded them when they least expected it and did not have enough troops or armament ready to defend themselves. So they tried the appeasement tactic of letting Hitler into their countries hoping he would leave them alone and not do a lot of harm. He did exactly the opposite.
Hitler was successful at the beginning of the war because he used deception, trickery and fearful oppression to overtake France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Denmark, The Netherlands and Norway. He tried to trick Russia but Stalin was onto his methods and Stalin bought time by signing a nonaggression pact, just as those other countries had done. He also fooled France and Britain by using an appeasement tactic to regain the Sudetenland. He acquired Italy by fooling Benito Mussolini into thinking he would be a big leader in the Axis but really Hitler used him so he could gain resources from Italy. He had Mussolini go after the oil in Africa too. Once the true colors of the Nazi regime and the Waffen SS was revealed Europeans learned to retaliate and fight against Hitler.
Hitler's Army was successful for a number of reasons. Some of these would be:
This is not the most comprehensive answer but it should go some way to helping. If you really want to know why Germany had it so good for so long I recommend studying!
Kind regards
R Lawson
hitler was gay , he loves dick up his bootay [:
Did you mean Fuhrer? If so, that was because "fuhrer" was German for "leader" and Hitler was the leader.
No he killed 6 million Jews. Hitler was no leader. he was a murderer ruthless. evil, Satan incarnate, Germans hate him more than UK. best thing Hitler ever did was Die,
Adolf Hitler until his death, and then Karl Donitz.
Hitler's Nazi Empire wasn't in complete control of Germany, it was a political party which had hitler as leader.
President Hindenburg.
yaa then only he ruled Germany for 12 years
Although there were many attempts to kill Hitler, none were successful. Hitler committed suicide with his wife when he knew that the Russians where going to capture and torture him and his wife to death.
Caligula was not a successful leader
Hitler ruled as leader of the Nazi Party of Germany.
Hitler was a member of the Nazi and then worked his way to leader party and then to Chancellor of Germany (leader).
Hitler was never the leader of Russia.
Adolf Hitler was the leader of the German Nazi Political Party and the German Leader from 1934 to 1945.
He was the leader of Germany.
Defining the type of political leader that Adolf Hitler was can be a difficult task. He was, after all, a charismatic leader, a diplomatic leader, a highly organized and patient leader -- in many ways a successful leader, if also a failure in the end. It is most true, perhaps, to say that he was a power-hungry, tyrannical, and violent leader whose brief reign at the head of Germany was mercifully ended by the effort of the Allies.
Hitler became leader of Germany on 30 January 1933.
No
No he was not successful as a leader