answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Rome was an empire under the Republican form of government. The republican form of government collapsed due to civil wars and political infighting. After the battle of Actium, Rome had the one man rule of an emperor, but the empire itself had already been firmly established.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

It didn't. An empire is an entity and a republic is a form of government. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. Rome became a empire in 146 BC, right after the Punic wars. During that time it was governed as a republic.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did rome change from a republic to an empire?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When did Rome change from a republic to an empire?

I


Why did rome turn from a republic to a empire?

Rome did not turn from a republic to an empire. The Roman republic already had an empire. In fact, much of Rome's imperial expansion occurred during the Republic. Rome's political system changed from republic to rule by emperors, not from republic to empire. This confusion is caused by historians who use the term empire in two senses. One is the commonly used territorial sense (the conquest of other peoples and their annexation into an empire). The other refers to Rome's period of rule by emperors. The change from republic to rule by emperors was a political one, not an economic one.


How did the Roman society shift from a republic to Empire?

Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.


How did Cleopatra change Rome's story from republic to empire?

Cleopatra had nothing to do with changing Rome's history from republic to empire. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. Because Cleopatra was the last queen of ancient Egypt and was defeated by Rome, her country became another Roman province -- an addition to Rome's empire. What she did do, was to help bring down the republic and enable Octavian to establish the principate.


What did Rome become after the republic failed?

An empire as it is erronously called. Rome was an empire under the republic. After the fall of the republic Rome became a Principate, ruled by a principle person.


Who are the two leaders in Rome's change from republic to an empire?

Julius Caesar and his adoptive son, Augustus.


What government did Rome go through prior to becoming an empire?

The monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in placeThe monarchy, which was followed by the republic. However remember that Rome was technically an empire under the republic. What is mistakenly called the "empire" was actually the principate a the empire was already in place


How did the Punic Wars help Rome develop as a republic?

Rome was already a republic. Rome developed an empire.


Why did Aeneas form the roman empire?

Augustus did not create the Roman empire. Rome had been an empire for about two hundred years before Augustus was even born. What Augustus did do was change its form of government from a republic to a principate.Augustus did not create the Roman empire. Rome had been an empire for about two hundred years before Augustus was even born. What Augustus did do was change its form of government from a republic to a principate.Augustus did not create the Roman empire. Rome had been an empire for about two hundred years before Augustus was even born. What Augustus did do was change its form of government from a republic to a principate.Augustus did not create the Roman empire. Rome had been an empire for about two hundred years before Augustus was even born. What Augustus did do was change its form of government from a republic to a principate.Augustus did not create the Roman empire. Rome had been an empire for about two hundred years before Augustus was even born. What Augustus did do was change its form of government from a republic to a principate.Augustus did not create the Roman empire. Rome had been an empire for about two hundred years before Augustus was even born. What Augustus did do was change its form of government from a republic to a principate.Augustus did not create the Roman empire. Rome had been an empire for about two hundred years before Augustus was even born. What Augustus did do was change its form of government from a republic to a principate.Augustus did not create the Roman empire. Rome had been an empire for about two hundred years before Augustus was even born. What Augustus did do was change its form of government from a republic to a principate.Augustus did not create the Roman empire. Rome had been an empire for about two hundred years before Augustus was even born. What Augustus did do was change its form of government from a republic to a principate.


When did the roman empire become a republic?

In 509 BC, a group of Roman aristrocrats were fed up with their Etruscan King, Tarquin. They drove him out of Rome, and leading Patrician families took power and ruled as members of the senate, Rome became a Kingless Republic.


Was Rome always an empire?

No, first it was a city, then a Republic, then a Empire, and then it collasped.


How did rome become a kingdom?

No. Rome was a Republic during 236. Rome was a monarchy in its founding and then again when it became the Roman Empire.