0
Social Darwinism when applied to the poor would mean no welfare programs, or help of any sort. The reason being is that if they are strong they will find a way to survive by themselves.If they are weak they will die out. Over a period of time the weak will die out and society will be strengthened.If, however, you give aid to the poor you contribute to the weakening of society as a whole by encouraging the propagation of the weaker members.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoDarwin's theory was that strong species wwould survive and the weak ones would die. while in society the strong people and bussinesses would prosper, and the weak ones would fail.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How does the gospel of wealth related to social darwinism?
The Gospel of Wealth was saying that everyone should get paid the same amount of money, where on the other side social Darwinism states that the strong will survive, so your answer will be..... the strong wouldn't be able to survive if everyone got paid the same amount of money, because then they would be just like everyone else.
What was an activity of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference SCLC?
It trained activists how to respond to poor treatment and arrest during protest.
What set of written laws was Romes first and applied to both the rich and the poor?
Twelve tables
What social class did the serfs belong to?
The serfs belonged to the poor class.
Why poor people leads to disability?
Wealthy people can better afford knowledge, foods, shelter, transportation, clothing, and medical treatment than poor people.
What traits did social darwinism encourage?
Social Darwinism encouraged traits such as competition, individualism, and the belief in survival of the fittest. It promoted the idea that success and wealth were signs of superior abilities and justified inequalities in society.
What was the long-term impact of Social Darwinism for non-Western cultures?
social darwinism is a term scholars use to describe the practice of misapplying rich and the poor as well as the many difference between cultures all over the world
How did robber barons justify their actions?
Robber barons justified their actions by arguing that their business practices were driving economic growth, creating jobs, and providing much-needed goods and services to the public. They also claimed that the accumulation of wealth and power was a result of their own hard work and entrepreneurial talents.
One reason for imperialism was social darwinism explain what this theory means?
Social Darwinism is the belief that the principles of natural selection and survival of the fittest apply to human societies, just as they do in nature. It was used to justify imperialism by claiming that stronger nations had the right to dominate and exploit weaker nations as part of a natural order of progress. This theory provided a moral justification for imperialistic actions by framing them as a way to advance the superior civilization.
Social darwinism was the idea that?
Social Darwinism was the idea that certain social groups or individuals are inherently superior to others, based on the principles of natural selection. It suggested that those who are the fittest or strongest should dominate and succeed, while the weak should not be supported. This belief system was often used to justify discrimination, inequality, and exploitation in society.
Social Darwinism?
This was a belief held by many that stated that the rich were rich and the poor were poor due to natural selection in society. This was the basis of many people who promoted a laissez fairee style of economy.
What occurs under the theory of social Darwinism?
Under the theory of social Darwinism, it is believed that societies and individuals compete with each other in a similar way to how species do in nature. This theory suggests that the most capable and strong individuals or societies will thrive and succeed, while those deemed less fit will struggle or perish. Social Darwinism has been used to justify inequalities, discrimination, and laissez-faire economic policies.
What is social racism?
Social Darwinism and social racism is not the same concept. Social Darwinism - the term (simplified) means vizhivanie in kaprinka without any help from the state, but the state does not intend to destroy you as a person. Ie a person has the right to be as poor as well as rich. Social racism is a more sophisticated policy aimed at the destruction of one group (usually the ruling) of the other groups of the society in order to capture material or other benefits. Example. Social Darwinism in the state will be forced to send and FREE armiyu.Libo go for free money or whether serve the poor. Social racism - no one will ask you to just take away the needy children in the army without pay, at the same time, children's Elite Law frees from military service. Besides, if the CP power yavyaetsya closed Clan (caste) for others.
Revivalist who believed the way to help the poor was by redeeming their souls?
One revivalist who believed this was Charles Finney, a prominent figure in the Second Great Awakening. He believed that by converting individuals to Christianity and instilling moral values, they would be empowered to improve their lives and social conditions. Finney's emphasis on personal responsibility and moral reform as a means to alleviate poverty was a central aspect of his evangelical message.
What is the major social or economic problems that stem from Laissez-faire and social Darwinism?
Mainly poverty because if one promotes the survival of only the best people then no one is taking care of those who cannot support themselves. Depression and recession and poverty are the main results of a pure Laissez-faire capitalist system including the aspects of social darwinism. it also allows those that do succeed to look down upon those that do not, and to feel superior, as if they deserve to be poor because that's just nature
What is the historical significance of Social Darwinism?
Was the belief that competition was part of human evolution and poverty existed as part of the natural order of things and that the small percentage of the wealthy at the top were the more evolved class of people. The belief applied terms from Darwin's An Origin of Species to social aspects of humans. Like, survival of the fittest and natural selection. It was a belief among many wealthy American businessmen: Sociologist Herbert Spencer; William Graham Sumner who wrote What Social Classes Owe to Each Other was considered the most influential Social Darwinist, he argued that social programs to designed to aid poor people worked against nature; Andrew Carnegie applied Darwin's survival of the fittest to society by believing that a free-market economy and noninterference of the government allowed the fittest to evolve. These people believed they were rich because they were evolutionally superior human beings.
What effects do mass migration have on the country that people are leaving?
people are leaving because of poor service or bad treatment
