Federalists believed in a strong central government. Obviously, the anti-federalists believed the very opposite. Some federalists might not have been completely satisfied with the US Constitution, but nobody really could be. The anti-federalists were very displeased with the US Constitution, though.
The Constitution outlines a strong central federal government, while Anti-Federalists preferred more power at the state level.
Anti-Federalists believed that the addition of a bill of rights to the Constitution was critical to the success of the new Federal Government.
The two major factions were the Federalists and the anti-federalists. The Federalists argued in favor of a strong central government, one that would not have the weaknesses of the old Articles of Confederation, while the anti-federalists were all the people who were afraid that a strong federal government would trample on the freedoms and liberties of the citizens. According to the Federalists, the Constitution granted only a few specific powers to the Federal government, and the people wouldn't need to worry about the Federal government overstepping its authority and interfering with the liberties of the people. The anti-federalists worried that there was nothing in the Constitution to PREVENT the central government from usurping the authority of the people or of the several States. The Federalists compromised by agreeing to a Bill of Rights; specific guarantees that the Federal government could never violate. The anti-federalists agreed, and the Constitution was adopted with the Bill of Rights guaranteeing certain freedoms of the people and strict limits to the power of the Federal government. In the past 220 years, we have seen that the Federalists were terribly wrong, and that the anti-federalists were painfully right. The limits put in place by the Bill of Rights has been trampled, and the freedoms of the people have been usurped, and the "limits" on the powers of the Federal government have been routinely ignored. Senators and Representatives in the Federal government utterly ignore their Constitutional limits, and since the Constitution included no provisions for its own enforcement, there is nothing to stop power-hungry legislators from doing whatever they please.
Actually, it was the Constitution that favored the Federalists. The Federalists generally favored the U.S. Constitution as providing for a federal nation. As opposed to the anti-Federalists, who favored the confederal model of a "united States" provided for in the preceding Articles of Confederation.Probably the best answer to why is that a federal model represented a conceptual compromise between that of a confederal state and that of a unitary state.The Constitution provided for (1) a federated congressional presidential republic; with (2) a supreme but limited federal government; and, (3) States co-sovereign with the federal government; and, (4) to whom residual powers were reserved.This has become known in U.S. Constitutional law as our federalism.
To show anti-federalists as well as the general public that the Constitution is a great thing.
yes. the federalists got their name from their support for the federal system of government (division of power between a central government and the state governments) as outlined in the constitution. the anti-federalists opposed the ratification of the constitution.
Federalists
Federalists
The Federalists supported the Constitution because it gave the federal government more power than the Articles of Confederation did. Although they did not agree with it completely, they felt this was a stepping stone towards a stronger federal government.
Federalists
The anti federalists criticized the constitution because they felt that it would give too much power to the federal government and take away the rights of the states and local government branches. The anti federalists argued that the constitution provided for a centralized form of government rather than a federal government form.
The anti-Federalists or Democratic Republicans, They were not happy with the Constitution because it gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of the individual states. They also were afraid the federal government would trample on the rights of the people so they insisted on adding the Bill of Rights to it just so that it would be clear that the new federal government would not become a new monarchy that was just overthrown. The Federalists were thrilled with it.
Federalists
The Constitution outlines a strong central federal government, while Anti-Federalists preferred more power at the state level.
Whether a Bill of Rights was necessary to include in the Constitution.
Anti-Federalists believed that the addition of a bill of rights to the Constitution was critical to the success of the new Federal Government.
Anti-Federalists believed that the addition of a Bill of Rights to the Constitution was critical to the success of the new Federal Government.