0
dred Scott and his family were not legal citizens, and therefore they were still slaves.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
John Sandford did not win the Dred Scott case. The case was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857 with Chief Justice Roger Taney writing the majority opinion. The court's decision was that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered American citizens and had no standing to bring a lawsuit in federal court.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who was sandford in the dred Scott v sandford case?
John Sanford, defendant in the landmark case Scott v. Sanford, (1857), was brother of Dr. Emerson's widow, Irene Emerson (Chaffee), and executor of Dr. John Emerson's estate.ExplanationDr. Emerson was a military physician who purchased Dred Scott from Peter Blow sometime around 1832. Emerson later met and married Eliza Irene Sanford (called Irene) in 1841, while stationed at a military post in Louisiana. When Emerson died in 1843, "ownership" of Dred Scott and his family passed to his widow, Irene.Dred and Harriet Scott originally sued Irene Emerson for their freedom in St. Louis County Circuit Court in July 1847. Irene later moved to Springfield, Massachusetts, leaving her brother, John Sanford in charge of the ongoing legal battle.Although Chief Justice Taney described John Sanford as the Scotts' owner, this appears to be either a misunderstanding, or a misrepresentation initiated by Sanford and/or his legal team.In 1857, the year the Supreme Court ruled on the Scott v. Sanford case, Irene Emerson married Dr. Chaffee, an abolitionist and US Senator who was completely unaware that his wife owned the most famous slave in the United States. Chaffee discovered his wife owned the Scott family shortly before the Court delivered its verdict.When Dred Scott lost, Chaffee arranged for ownership to be transferred from Irene to Taylor Blow (son Peter Blow), who emancipated the family in May 1857. Chaffee's involvement in the transfer tends to support the idea that Sanford had no legal claim to the Scott family, and only had standing in Court by virtue of his status as executor.Court Citation:Dred Scott v. Sandford*, 60 US 393 (1857)* Proper spelling of the last name is Sanford, not Sandford. The Court made a clerical error that survived to the printed edition of United States Reports, the official government reporter of Supreme Court decisions, and therefore cannot be corrected.
Was the Chief Justice who presided at the trial of Dred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom.?
No, the Chief Justice who presided over the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney. Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom based on his residence in free territories.
Who was dred scotts owner?
Army surgeon Dr. John Emerson owned Scott. He died before the Dred Scott case was over. His widow appealed the case after his death which ended up in the Supreme Court which decided the Scott should not be freed.
Why did dread Scott take Emerson and sandford to court What did he want?
Dred Scott sued John Emerson's widow, Irene Sanford, for his freedom because he claimed that living in a free state and territory had made him legally free. Scott sought to establish his freedom and that of his family members.
How much Did Dr John Emerson pay for Dred Scott?
Dr. John Emerson did not pay for Dred Scott; rather, he was owned by other individuals before eventually being owned by the Emerson family. Dred Scott's legal case revolved around his claim to freedom based on having lived in free territories, despite being a slave.
What was the proper name for the Dred Scott case?
Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford, 60 US 393 (1857)The short title is Scott v. Sandford, but the case is often referred to colloquially as "the Dred Scott case." Sandford is misspelled in the Supreme Court documents; the proper spelling is Sanford, without a d. This cannot be corrected, however.
What did Dred Scott claim John Sanford did to him and his family?
First of all, John Sandford was not the original defendant in the case. The original defendant was Irene Emerson, Dred Scott's owner. John Sandford was Irene Emerson's brother, and acted on her behalf. As such, Dred Scott never claimed that John Sandford did anything to his family. Now as far as Irene Emerson goes, Dred Scott claimed that she was harming him and his family by not allowing them to be free, in violation of the Missouri Compromise. Scott's claim was that since he had lived in free states (namely, Illinois and Wisconsin Territory) where the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery, that should have made him free.
Who was sandford in the dred Scott v sandford case?
John Sanford, defendant in the landmark case Scott v. Sanford, (1857), was brother of Dr. Emerson's widow, Irene Emerson (Chaffee), and executor of Dr. John Emerson's estate.ExplanationDr. Emerson was a military physician who purchased Dred Scott from Peter Blow sometime around 1832. Emerson later met and married Eliza Irene Sanford (called Irene) in 1841, while stationed at a military post in Louisiana. When Emerson died in 1843, "ownership" of Dred Scott and his family passed to his widow, Irene.Dred and Harriet Scott originally sued Irene Emerson for their freedom in St. Louis County Circuit Court in July 1847. Irene later moved to Springfield, Massachusetts, leaving her brother, John Sanford in charge of the ongoing legal battle.Although Chief Justice Taney described John Sanford as the Scotts' owner, this appears to be either a misunderstanding, or a misrepresentation initiated by Sanford and/or his legal team.In 1857, the year the Supreme Court ruled on the Scott v. Sanford case, Irene Emerson married Dr. Chaffee, an abolitionist and US Senator who was completely unaware that his wife owned the most famous slave in the United States. Chaffee discovered his wife owned the Scott family shortly before the Court delivered its verdict.When Dred Scott lost, Chaffee arranged for ownership to be transferred from Irene to Taylor Blow (son Peter Blow), who emancipated the family in May 1857. Chaffee's involvement in the transfer tends to support the idea that Sanford had no legal claim to the Scott family, and only had standing in Court by virtue of his status as executor.Court Citation:Dred Scott v. Sandford*, 60 US 393 (1857)* Proper spelling of the last name is Sanford, not Sandford. The Court made a clerical error that survived to the printed edition of United States Reports, the official government reporter of Supreme Court decisions, and therefore cannot be corrected.
Was a slave who had once belonged to an army surgeon named John Emerson.?
dred scott
Who did John Sanford hire to argue his side of the Scott v. Sandford case before the US Supreme Court?
Dred Scott v. Sandford,* 60 US 393 (1857)John Sanford (*the last name was misspelled as "Sandford" on court documents) hired two attorneys to represent his interests before the US Supreme Court:Reverdy Johnson, a nationally known Constitutional lawyer from Maryland; andHenry S. Geyer, a St. Louis attorney and US Senator for Missouri.
Was the Chief Justice who presided at the trial of Dred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom.?
No, the Chief Justice who presided over the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney. Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom based on his residence in free territories.
Who Was a slave who had once belonged to an army surgeon named John Emerson.?
dred scott
Who was dred scotts owner?
Army surgeon Dr. John Emerson owned Scott. He died before the Dred Scott case was over. His widow appealed the case after his death which ended up in the Supreme Court which decided the Scott should not be freed.
Who was the fifth Chief Justice of the United States?
Roger B. Taney succeeded John Marshall to become the fifth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Taney presided over the Court from 1836 until 1864, and is best remembered for his horrible decision in the Dred Scott case (Scott v. Sandford, (1857).
Who was Dred Scott's Master?
dred scotts master was dr. john Emerson
Who was John Emerson's slave?
Dred Scott.
Why did dread Scott take Emerson and sandford to court What did he want?
Dred Scott sued John Emerson's widow, Irene Sanford, for his freedom because he claimed that living in a free state and territory had made him legally free. Scott sought to establish his freedom and that of his family members.
