answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Dred Scott v. Sandford,* 60 US 393 (1857)

John Sanford (*the last name was misspelled as "Sandford" on court documents) hired two attorneys to represent his interests before the US Supreme Court:

  1. Reverdy Johnson, a nationally known Constitutional lawyer from Maryland; and
  2. Henry S. Geyer, a St. Louis attorney and US Senator for Missouri.
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who did John Sanford hire to argue his side of the Scott v. Sandford case before the US Supreme Court?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What landmark Supreme Court decisions was a prime factor leading to the Civil War?

Dred Scott v. Sanford


What supreme court ruling said that blacks could not become citizens of the US?

Dred Scott v. Sandford,* 60 US 393 (1857)*Sandford is misspelled in the court documents; the respondent's real last name was Sanford.


Which court case did the Supreme Court declare the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional?

Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)The court case was Dred Scott v. Sandford, in 1857.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What are facts about the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?


What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case?

That Scott had no right to argue in court


What US Supreme Court case attempted to settle the slavery question?

Dred Scott v. Sanford*, 60 US 393 (1857)In the Dred Scott decision, the Court held that people who had been slaves, or who descended from slaves, were not protected by the Constitution and could never be US citizens. Without citizenship status, African-Americans were denied access to the courts, and couldn't sue for their freedom, even if they had a contractual agreement granting them free status.The Supreme Court also ruled that Congress had no right to prohibit slavery, nullifying the Missouri Compromise.The Court's decision in this case was overturned by the Thirteenth Amendment, prohibiting slavery.* The name Sanford is misspelled as Sandford in US ReportsFor more information, see Related Questions, below.


What was the proper name for the Dred Scott case?

Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford, 60 US 393 (1857)The short title is Scott v. Sandford, but the case is often referred to colloquially as "the Dred Scott case." Sandford is misspelled in the Supreme Court documents; the proper spelling is Sanford, without a d. This cannot be corrected, however.


What did the Supreme Court called slaves?

The Supreme Court referred to slaves as property in the infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857.


Supreme court case that ruled slaves were not citizens and could not sue?

In 1857, the Dred Scott vs Sanford case came before the US Supreme Court. Part of the decision in that case was that Blacks were not citizens and therefore could not bring a lawsuit to any court.


The United States Supreme Court decision in the Dred Scott v Sandford 1857 was important because it-?

The United States Supreme Court decision in the DDred Scott v. Sandford (1857 was important because it helped strengthen the determination of abolitionists to realize their goals.


Which Supreme Court case ruled that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights?

Dred Scott v. Sandford


How many years did it take for Dred Scott v Sandford to reach the Supreme Court?

Who no da answer