The cotton industry depended totally on slave-labour, and as cotton became more and more profitable, Southern leaders fought hard to hold back the tide of Abolitionism, promoting slavery as a beneficial system, and eventually putting pressure on church ministers to preach that it was a God-given arrangement of master and man.
As a economic issue
They viewed them as useful. They helped with trade and both the north and south argued about slavery towards them
The south was against slavery.
The union viewed slavery as a huge problem that threatened America. Every time there was a dispute between the North and the South, one of them threatened to split from the union.
Actually the NORTH was against slavery, and the SOUTH wanted slavery.
As a economic issue
The north was against slavery, and the south favored it.
The north disliked it and prohibited it and the south liked it and allowed it.
As a economic issue
there are tons of other websites that will give you that answer but the main reason was because of slavery issues between the north and the south. the north was anti slavery and the south was pro slavery.
as an economic issue
as an economic issue
Charles Pinckney believed that slavery was essential to the Southern economy and way of life. He defended the institution of slavery and argued for its protection in the Constitution during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. However, he also expressed concerns about the morality of slavery and the potential consequences it could have on the nation in the long term.
They viewed them as useful. They helped with trade and both the north and south argued about slavery towards them
He thinks slavery should be allowed and that he must go with the south because he is a virginiain.
The south was against slavery.
He was anti-slavery