As the empire expanded from being only Arabia, the political organization of Islam changed from being one governed by tribal codes and ethics to one with an imperial capital, provinces, and ostentatious royalty. Democracy and meritocracy were replaced with monarchy. A bureaucracy was developed in Damascus using former Sassanian and Byzantine talents. This is rather unique because in most empires, a conquered population was kept out of the ruling apparatus. However, in the Arab Empires, there was a strong intent to integrate the conquered populations and many in the territories wished to become Muslim due either to conviction or to financial incentive. The Maghreb, Spain, and Afghanistan were militarily annexed and there were expeditions (military) sent as far as Xinjiang Province (East Turkestan) is China. The empire was held together by institutions such as the governates, roads, and police/soldiers, just like every other empire. It just happens that track record of violence and repression is better for the Arab Empire than contemporaneous states.
The Umayyads ruled by appointing local governors waliyinin each province or wilaya that would organize things locally and send the information to the Caliph in Damascus at reasonable intervals.
Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.
Territories had a govern, a secretary, and three judges :)
Bureaucracy
it was corrupteed because we became greedy and power mad and also George Bush
how did ghana kings govern such a large empire? Whoever posted that, is INCORRECT! The correct answer would be: They allowed people in other territories to choose their own leaders. HOPE I HELPED. :) ~Bethany Gladish:)
Emperors govern their empires; they are the heads of state of their territories.
the road system helped the incas govern their vast empire
Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.
The most direct and brief answer is that the superior military forces of ancient Rome conquered and / or subdued ancient Greece.
Roads.
To govern, they divided their empire into provinces. Each province had a Roman governor supported by an army.
They were governed as territories.
China
No. The VP does not govern anything.
Territories had a govern, a secretary, and three judges :)
Bureaucracy
Yes. He was govenor of Indiana Territory from 1800 to 1812.