In most european countries, at this time period, only the wealthy were able to afford education for their children; they employed one or more private tutours to school the child in various subjects. The children of commonfolk would generally learn the skills of their same-sex parent (which often did not include reading) and then either take over their business, or the more fortunate would be taken on as an apprentice to a craftsman (a Farrier, or Miller perhaps), and learn that trade.
In the 1600s, children in Europe were primarily educated through private tutors, apprenticeships, and church-run schools. Wealthy families could afford private tutors for their children, while many others learned basic literacy and numeracy skills through apprenticeships in trades or attending local church schools. Formal education was not widely accessible to all children during this time.
Poor Victorian children were often unable to attend school due to financial constraints or needing to work to support their families. Those who did attend typically received a basic education in a charity or Sunday school, where reading, writing, and arithmetic were taught. The quality of education varied greatly depending on the resources available in their community.
toys
Educated parents can affect children a future because the future of children's depend upon parents life so if parents are educated ,socialized and civilized than they will also make these children educated ,socialized and civilized so educated parents affect children's future
all children in the UK are educated
In schools of course. Although many children were educated at home.
bad
They were educated very well.
they were educated by there parents and there preiests
the
A very bad one
to do the eletive
the average amount of children a colonial woman had in the 1600s is 9 children