0
How did the general Sulla change the Roman government when he became dictator after taking power?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Sulla:
1 increased the number of officers of state elected in any given year
2 gave the newly elected quaestors gain automatic membership in the Senate.
These two reforms allowed Sulla to increase the size of the Senate (from 300 to 600 senators) and removed the need for the censor to draw up a list of senators
3 transferred the control of the courts from members of the equestrian order to the senators and increased the number of courts, thus strengthening the power of the senators.
4 Ended the role of the Assembly of the Soldiers as a court of appeal for capital punishment cases and of the Assembly of the Tribes as a court of appeal for other cases and transferred these to jury courts
5 codified and finalised the cursus honorum, the career ladder for public office, and set the minimum age to be eligible for each office
6 reaffirmed the requirement of ten years to elapse before being re-elected to any office.
7 established that the consuls and the praetors were to serve as provincial governors for the year after they left office.
Sulla also took measured to weaken the plebeian tribunes. They were deprived of the power to propose legislation to the Plebeian Council and the power to veto the acts of the senate. Ex-tribunes were prohibited from holding any other office. The tribunes' power to protect individuals remained intact. Not long after Sulla's death, these measures were repealed
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThis is tough to answer in one shot, though I'll give it a try. Sulla was the embodiment of the conservative faction in Republican Rome, perhaps the one man in Republican history who could match Caesar for raw political and military talent. The man who thrashed the forces of the Pontic king Mithridates and reduced the radical Marian faction to irrelevance, he was considered by many excessive in his methods, and often his Dictatorship will be highlighted as a dark point for Rome, but in actuality he was a man fighting for what he believed to be the ideal of the Republic. His work in restructuring the Constitution- had the next generation preserved it- might have prevented the decline into a totalitarian Empire. If you're interested in learning more about one of the greatest and most misunderstood figures of history, I recommend "Sulla: The Last Republican" by Prof. Arthur Keaveney.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoSulla bwas tasked to reform the Roman institutions and:
1 increased the number of officers of state elected in any given year
#
2 gave the newly elected quaestors gain automatic membership in the Senate.
These two reforms allowed Sulla to increase the size of the Senate (from 300 to 600 senators) and removed the need for the censor to draw up a list of senators
3 transferred the control of the courts from members of the equestrian order to the senators and increased the number of courts, thus strengthening the power of the senators.
4 Ended the role of the Assembly of the Soldiers as a court of appeal for capital punishment cases and of the Assembly of the Tribes as a court of appeal for other cases and transferred these to jury courts
5 codified and finalised the cursus honorum, the career ladder for public office, and set the minimum age to be eligible for each office
6 reaffirmed the requirement of ten years to elapse before being re-elected to any office.
7 established that the consuls and the praetors were to serve as provincial governors for the year after they left office.
Sulla also took measured to weaken the plebeian tribunes. They were deprived of the power to propose legislation to the Plebeian Council and the power to veto the acts of the senate. Ex-tribunes were prohibited from holding any other office. The tribunes' power to protect individuals remained intact. Not long after Sulla's death, these measures were repealed
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoHe extended the usual 6 month dictatorship to two years to re-establish control over a warring Rome. This gave only temporary stability and, after he retired, the competing nobility progressively brought back instability, leading Julius Caesar to try five years, then life dictatorship., which was easily resolved by the aristocrats terminating his life. Augustus solved the problem by a partnership with the Senate, and called himself First Citizen.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why Did Robespierre Become A Dictator?
Robespierre became a dictator, because he wanted to change the way of the French government and so he thought that this way of government was a fair one and better than the old way of government, a monarchy.
Did Julius Caesar became dictator of Rome as a result of a change in Constitution?
no, senators assassinated ceasar before he had a chance to become a dictator
Why did mexico change from unlimited to limited government after the mexican revolution?
The dictator was killed.
How do civilizations change?
Government became more powerful
How can use dictator in a sentence?
Many people who want to change the world can be a dictator
What can influence the timing of a General Election?
The Queen decides it is time for a change of Government.
How did New York government or business change when New York Became a state?
it is a charter
How did the early republic change during times of war?
A Dictator and Master of Horse were appointed to temporarily take over government to steer the state through the crisis.
How did Augustus Caesar help transform Rome from a republic to an empire?
Julius Caesar actually contributed very little to the change in government. Rome was an empire under the republic. It's government was not changed from the republican form of government to the principate form of government (which is erroneously called the empire) until the reign of Augustus, fourteen years after Caesar's death. The only possible connection Caesar could have to the governmental change was that he accepted the position of dictator for life, foreshadowing the principate.Julius Caesar actually contributed very little to the change in government. Rome was an empire under the republic. It's government was not changed from the republican form of government to the principate form of government (which is erroneously called the empire) until the reign of Augustus, fourteen years after Caesar's death. The only possible connection Caesar could have to the governmental change was that he accepted the position of dictator for life, foreshadowing the principate.Julius Caesar actually contributed very little to the change in government. Rome was an empire under the republic. It's government was not changed from the republican form of government to the principate form of government (which is erroneously called the empire) until the reign of Augustus, fourteen years after Caesar's death. The only possible connection Caesar could have to the governmental change was that he accepted the position of dictator for life, foreshadowing the principate.Julius Caesar actually contributed very little to the change in government. Rome was an empire under the republic. It's government was not changed from the republican form of government to the principate form of government (which is erroneously called the empire) until the reign of Augustus, fourteen years after Caesar's death. The only possible connection Caesar could have to the governmental change was that he accepted the position of dictator for life, foreshadowing the principate.Julius Caesar actually contributed very little to the change in government. Rome was an empire under the republic. It's government was not changed from the republican form of government to the principate form of government (which is erroneously called the empire) until the reign of Augustus, fourteen years after Caesar's death. The only possible connection Caesar could have to the governmental change was that he accepted the position of dictator for life, foreshadowing the principate.Julius Caesar actually contributed very little to the change in government. Rome was an empire under the republic. It's government was not changed from the republican form of government to the principate form of government (which is erroneously called the empire) until the reign of Augustus, fourteen years after Caesar's death. The only possible connection Caesar could have to the governmental change was that he accepted the position of dictator for life, foreshadowing the principate.Julius Caesar actually contributed very little to the change in government. Rome was an empire under the republic. It's government was not changed from the republican form of government to the principate form of government (which is erroneously called the empire) until the reign of Augustus, fourteen years after Caesar's death. The only possible connection Caesar could have to the governmental change was that he accepted the position of dictator for life, foreshadowing the principate.Julius Caesar actually contributed very little to the change in government. Rome was an empire under the republic. It's government was not changed from the republican form of government to the principate form of government (which is erroneously called the empire) until the reign of Augustus, fourteen years after Caesar's death. The only possible connection Caesar could have to the governmental change was that he accepted the position of dictator for life, foreshadowing the principate.Julius Caesar actually contributed very little to the change in government. Rome was an empire under the republic. It's government was not changed from the republican form of government to the principate form of government (which is erroneously called the empire) until the reign of Augustus, fourteen years after Caesar's death. The only possible connection Caesar could have to the governmental change was that he accepted the position of dictator for life, foreshadowing the principate.
How did the euro change Europe politically?
It started as "free trade" under the EU. Then it became the government . . . somehow.
How did Roman government change during emergencies?
The Senate appointed a Dictator for six months, supported by a Master of Horse, with full powers to either resolve an electoral failure or defence emergency.
How is the government going to change in Cuba?
It is too soon to tell. Though they were brothers Fidel Castro and his brother have different philosophies about government. A prediction is that his brother is less stringent and less of a dictator. We shall know within the next few months.
