0
How did the settling of new territories escalate conflict over slavery?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
The new territories were made up of whites witch also wanted slaves to work on their plantations so they could make a profit so the slaves were being sold for more money and therefore meant that they were higher in value to people
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
The settlement of new territories in the United States heightened conflict over slavery because it raised questions about whether these territories would allow slavery or be free. This tension intensified as each side sought to exert influence over the new territories to ensure its position on slavery was upheld. Ultimately, these disputes led to the Civil War, as the North and South could not reconcile their differing views on slavery in the expanding nation.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was slavery conflict about?
The conflict over slavery in the United States was primarily about the moral and economic implications of treating humans as property. It also centered around the balance of power between free states and slave states, as well as the debate over whether slavery should be allowed to expand into new territories.
Is it the right of the people to have slavery or not have it as they see fit in the territories?
The issue of slavery was a contentious one in the territories during the mid-19th century. The question of whether slavery should be allowed or prohibited in the territories was a central debate leading up to the Civil War. Ultimately, the issue was settled through legislation such as the Missouri Compromise and the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which aimed to address the spread of slavery into new territories.
Why did David Wilmot wanted slavery prohibited in territories acquired from which country?
David Wilmot wanted slavery prohibited in territories acquired from Mexico in order to prevent the spread of slavery into new territories, as he believed that allowing slavery to expand would only further entrench the institution in the United States. This proposal, known as the Wilmot Proviso, aimed to preserve the western territories for free labor and was part of the broader political debates surrounding the expansion of slavery in the mid-19th century.
What effect did the Kansas-Nebraska act 1854 have on the conflict over slavery?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 heightened tensions over slavery by allowing settlers to determine whether slavery would be allowed in those territories, effectively overturning the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This led to violent clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas," and further polarized the nation on the issue of slavery.
What did wil mot proviso call for?
The Wilmot Proviso called for banning slavery in territories acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. It aimed to prevent the spread of slavery into these new territories.
What was the conflict between the Northern and Southern States as territories from the Louisiana Purchase apply for statehood?
The major source of conflict over granting statehood was the slavery question-- would slavery be allowed in the new state?
What has the author Merchant of Philadelphia written?
Merchant of Philadelphia. has written: 'The end of the irrepressible conflict' -- subject(s): Slavery, Extension to the territories, Controversial literature
Is slavery a conflict of the Revolutionary War?
Slavery is not a conflict of the Revolutionary war.
Who said no slavery in new territories?
The Republican Party and the Quakers were the leading opponents of expanding slavery into the new territories.
What was the topic of the Lincoln-Douglas debates?
Slavery in the territories
What presidential candidate completely opposed the spread of slavery to westerns territories?
Abraham Lincoln completely opposed the spread of slavery to western territories.
Why did the US Congress agree to the Missouri Compromise?
To address the conflict over slavery
Why did the conflict arise in 1848 in western territories over the issue of slavery?
In the election of 1848, the Democrats chose a platform that remained silent on slavery. Nominee Lewis Cass was pro-slavery, so many anti-slavery Democrats walked out of the Baltimore convention to begin the Free Soil party.
Why was there a conflict about slavery?
Slavery was and is morally wrong.
Lincoln was opposed to slavery in the?
Territories
Was there slavery in the territories of the Mexican cession?
No - there was no slavery in the new territories - California or New Mexico or Utah. Texas was a slave state already.
Which political party wanted to keep slavery out of the western territories?
The Free-Soil Party wanted the western territories to be free from slavery.
