General Porfirio Díaz (1830-1915) was a mestizo from Oaxaca. He opposed Santa Ana, fought for Juarez in the War of Reform, and with his brother fought against Emperor Maximilian. He was one of Juarez's more effective generals. He ran unsuccessfully against President Juarez (1871). He claimed electoral fraud and decided to use force and overthrow the government (1876). He introduced a Dictatorship which ruled Mexico for nearly 40 years. is iron-fisted rule, which lasted almost 40 years which Mexicans refer to as the Porfiriato. He and his Cientificos ruled Mexico under the banner of "Liberty, Order, and Progress". Díaz had a very specific interpretation of these terms. Liberty was extended to supportive landowners, industrialists, and entrepreneurs to make money. Order was enforced through a policy of pan y palo (bread and club). Progress was rapid economic development. Díaz negotiated arrangements with foreiners in which he and his associates profited personally. Any opposition or even criticism was suppressed, often brutally. The Díaz dictatorship introduced a degree of modernization. Mexico in 1910 had a much more developed infrastructure than that of the country he had seized control of in 1876. It was, however, still an underdeveloped country. Díaz did not address Mexico's deep-seeded social problems. Ans a key area that he did not invest in was Mexico's human capital. Mexico was still a country with a small middle-class and a largely illiterate rural peasantry living in essentially feudal conditions. The Mexican Revolution was the first of the great 20th century peasant revolutions. When the Revolution came, it was a surprise to everyone--not the least to Mexicans. Díaz was astonished that the effete little teetotaling lawyer could succeed in overthrowing him. When departing for Mexico he warned, "Madero has unleashed a tiger, let us see if he can control him."
The above explanation explains why Dias was overthrown, but does not explain why the Mexican Revolution erupted into a major Revolution. Mexico was not only an underdeveloped country with a small middle-class, but it was a largely rural country with a largely landless peasantry, primarily of Native American ancestry. Most of Mexico's productive land was owned by a small number of wealthy hacendados operating huge, sprawling estates. When the peasantry joined the largely middle-class revolt that Madero launched, for better or worse, the Revolution began. Yes this is an important addition. I personally would add the absence of the rule of law, especially for the peasantry.
The above covers the causes of the Revolution, but a very important question that must be addressed in connection to the Revolution is if it promoted Mexico's development as a modern, productive country or created a political structure which made this development possible. And particularly did it establish the rule of law, a central component of a modern society. And an important part of this discussion is to what extent the modern situation where working-class Mexicans have to migrate to the United States to find decent paying jobs has its roots in the Revolution.
It began with Father Hidalgo's Grito de Dolores.
Father Miguel Hidalgo.
the texans got mad at the mexicans
In the year 1846.
September 16, 1810.
The U.S knew if it wanted to make Texas a state Mexico would start a war.
No
What did zimmermann propose that Mexico do if war between Germany and the us
Between the United States and Mexico? Mexico City.
On 13 May 1846, the US congress declared war on Mexico. Mexico never declared war on the United States.
A provocation to start a war, as Mexico had already warned the US that annexation would mean war (it did; and Mexico lost).
a war between usa and Mexico
There was never a war between the South and the West in the US. There was a war between the North and the South and between Mexico and America.
Mexico City.
1846