I am no expert in philosophy; but deciding on whether material objects exist (i.e. whether you decide that either all material objects exist, some do, or none do) will determine how you approach finding knowledge in such a reality. In a material world, you will reach knowledge based on empiricism; in a non-material world, you will reach knowledge through deductive reasoning because that a priori knowledge would be all that is possible.
Remember that empiricists and rationalists reach the same conclusions, only through different procedures. Deciding then on an idealist view or a materialist view, despite being the greatest issue in metaphysics, is thus of little consequence to epistemology.
It really depends on in metaphysics if you believe that these conclusions are real by an objective standard: I guess that means truth is the real question. I never did like metaphysics; I see it as a guessing game, trying to write things in God's dictionary.
Just develop a theory of reality for yourself and what will come from that is a method of questioning what you can and do know.
Metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and logic. Titus et al, Living Issues in Philosophy (Nostand Co., 1979), page 14ff.
Epistemology is the science about how we gather knowledge
Ontology, cosmology, causality, free will and mind and matter
Metaphysics is not a school or tradition but rather a sub-discipline within philosophy, as are ethics, logic and epistemology. Like many philosophical terms, "metaphysics" can be understood in a variety of ways, so any discussion of Bertrand Russell's metaphysics must select from among the various possible ways of understanding the notion, for example, as the study of being qua being, the study of the first principles or grounds of being, the study of God, and so forth. The primary sense of "metaphysics" examined here in connection to Russell is the study of the ultimate nature and constituents of reality.Since what we know, if anything, is assumed to be real, doctrines in metaphysics typically dovetail with doctrines in epistemology. But in this article, discussion of Russell's epistemology is kept to a minimum in order to better canvas his metaphysics, beginning with his earliest adult views in 1897 and ending shortly before his death in 1970. Russell revises his conception of the nature of reality in both large and small ways throughout his career. Still, there are positions that he never abandons; particularly, the belief that reality is knowable, that it is many, that there are entities - universals - that do not exist in space and time, and that there are truths that cannot be known by direct experience or inference but are known a priori.The word "metaphysics" sometimes is used to describe questions or doctrines that are a priori, that is, that purport to concern what transcends experience, and particularly sense-experience. Thus, a system may be called metaphysical if it contains doctrines, such as claims about the nature of the good or the nature of human reason, whose truth is supposed to be known independently of (sense) experience. Such claims have characterized philosophy from its beginnings, as has the belief that they are meaningful and valuable. However, from the modern period on, and especially in Russell's own lifetime, various schools of philosophy began to deny the legitimacy and desirability of a priorimetaphysical theorizing. In fact, Russell's life begins in a period sympathetic to this traditional philosophical project, and ends in a period which is not. Concerning these "meta-metaphysical" issues (that is, doctrines not in metaphysics but aboutit and its feasibility), Russell remained emphatically a metaphysician throughout his life. In fact, in his later work, it is this strand more than doctrines about the nature of reality per se that justify his being considered as one of the last, great metaphysicians.
True.
The questions and issues the team are experiencing.
Philosophy is concerned with issues such as ontology (the nature and structure of being) and epistemology (the nature of and limits to human knowledge), as well as ethics. As such, the study of a religion such as Christianity would be included in a modern philosophy class. This leads to philosophical questions such as whether or not God exists, and how we should arrive at a conclusion, if at all.
You'll need to ask questions about your specific issues.
It is the point in the story when the plot plays out, issues are explained, questions are answered
1. What constitutional issues and/or questions unanswered in the U.S. Constitution as of 1860 tore the nation apart in 1861?
hi... knowledge issues are known to be open ended questions, that question and argue things all around.
Please rewrite your questions. We can not know the issues listed on your worksheet/ review questions/ test.