This is common in group-think and mob mentality. When you have an accussed and a fair number of accusors by validating the majority you can be percieved as a fellow peer in the group. So if 10 people accuse Jane of being a witch, affirming that accusation makes you feel (legitimately or otherwise) as part of the 10 people's group. In addition you have a measure of power over the accused as being part of deciding their fate. For people on the fringe of an organization or social group this can be a tempting method of gaining status within the group by "helping" the group one is seeking membership\standing with. This same behavior can be seen in popular cop dramas where there is a circle of dirty cops and the initiate is required to murder someone to gain membership. Now lets make the initiate a weaker individual who wants to be part of the tough crowd of cops. He's willing to do anything to gain acceptance so while ruffing up a crook he joins in to show he's "one of the gang". Insecure people who need a feeling of belonging in smaller, tight-nit communities in those days would have siezed upon the trial as a way to show they were part of the social circle of the original accusors. The more influential the original accusors were the more likely the fringe elements would "tag along". "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" best sums up this behavior. The weak became the enemy of the accused in an effort to show they are a friend of the accusors...
George Burroughs, the Maine reverand.
The McCarthy Witch trials are actually considered McCarthyism. This is the practice of accusing individuals of disloyalty, treason and subversion without any factual evidence. This originates from a period in the U.S known as the Second Red Scare, from the 1940's and 1950's.
committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide during World War II. The trials were held between 1945 and 1946 and resulted in the conviction of top Nazi officials such as Hermann Göring, Rudolf Hess, and Albert Speer. The Nuremberg Trials set a precedent for holding individuals accountable for their actions during times of war.
Obviously, the Salem Witch Trials tried a very different crime. But, other than that, the Salem Trials were very much like a normal civil trial today.
Bench trials are when the judge is the decider of fact. A jury trial is where a jury plays that role and determines the verdict.
One example would be Abagail Williams. Before the witch trials had happened she was just a normal teen in the small town. After it all went down she pretty much had the power of arresting and hangings. All she had to do was accuse someone and the elder believed them. Except for a few but she had the others so convinced no one believed the others and they were punished.
Individuals are responsible for their own actions
Amendment 6 (criminal trials.) Protection of the federal Gov'
Women are of a lower social rank in Puritan society than men. Only men can lead in church, and the church rules the society. This therefore makes the women quite powerless. The Salem witch trials give women, especially the young and unmarried Abigail Williams, a power over the important and influential members of society. By using the witchcraft trials, Abigail is able to accuse innocent citizens and receive the attention and power that she previously lacked.
Witch trials took place in Salem Massachusetts 1692 which led to the incarceration and death of many innocent individuals.
The Nuremberg War trials began on November 20, 1945. Twenty four individuals were accused of many violations including crimes against humanity.
yes
Nuremberg Trials
Clinical trials are controlled and paid experiments using humans as subjects. The clinical trials may consists of taking medicines or administration of it to an informed individual or group of informed individuals. The results from these trials are used for the improvement of certain treatment modalities or how to control a specific illness.
The answer depends on what the trials are, what constitutes a favourable outcome, and how many possible outcomes there were previously. And since you have not bothered to provide these crucial bits of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.The answer depends on what the trials are, what constitutes a favourable outcome, and how many possible outcomes there were previously. And since you have not bothered to provide these crucial bits of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.The answer depends on what the trials are, what constitutes a favourable outcome, and how many possible outcomes there were previously. And since you have not bothered to provide these crucial bits of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.The answer depends on what the trials are, what constitutes a favourable outcome, and how many possible outcomes there were previously. And since you have not bothered to provide these crucial bits of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
George Burroughs, the Maine reverand.
The McCarthy Witch trials are actually considered McCarthyism. This is the practice of accusing individuals of disloyalty, treason and subversion without any factual evidence. This originates from a period in the U.S known as the Second Red Scare, from the 1940's and 1950's.