Want this question answered?
Yes. There is no system of measurement that is "perfect" in every way. We work hard to reduce error or uncertainty when we measure stuff, but we cannot eliminate it.
the advantages of this method was that it is more quick and less calculation needed and the disadvantages, it less accurate compare to the rise and fall method.
eliminate, expel
When a wave traversing in a medium of less refractive index gets reflected at a medium of greater refractive index then wave undergoes a phase change of pi radians. But if the same reflection takes place as the wave traverses from a medium of greater refractive index to that of less refractive index, then no such phase change. The later reflection is known as total internal reflection. So as light traversing in air gets reflected at glass then phase change of pi radians occurs.
gross errors,random errors, and instrumental errors.
is to eliminate collimation error
it is line set out by the optical axis of the instrument ( level). so it is just an imaginary line that describes the ray of light that allowes us to read different values from the leveling staff. this term arose from the fact that in differential leveling in surveying we must construct horizontal line of sight, but due to collimation error the collimation line (i.e. line of sight) will not be 100% horizontal (by horizontal we mean tangent the level surface at the instrument position), instead it will be slightly deviated. so what we are looking to achieve when we eliminate the collimation error (using the 2 peg test) is a horizontal line of collimation.
there are few types of errors in levelling...... these arr...... 1- instrumental error 2- collimation error 3- errors due to curvature and refraction 4- some other errors also
error in alignment between the optical axis of a telescope & the declination. it is line set out by the optical axis of the instrument ( level). so it is just an imaginary line that describes the ray of light that allows us to read different values from the leveling staff. this term arose from the fact that in differential leveling in surveying we must construct horizontal line of sight, but due to collimation error the collimation line (i.e. line of sight) will not be 100% horizontal (by horizontal we mean tangent the level surface at the instrument position), instead it will be slightly deviated. so what we are looking to achieve when we eliminate the collimation error (using the 2 peg test) is a horizontal line of collimation.
The height of collimation is the height of the line of sight. It is the vertical distance of the horizontal plane through a telescope.
diaphragm
Collimation is used for telescopes to make sure the telescopes are perfectly aligned. The reflector will not produce the best image if the aligned is not just right.
Collimation Error: Collimation error occurs when the collimation axis is not truly horizontal when the instrument is level. The effect is illustrated in the sketch below, where the collimation axis is tilted with respect to the horizontal by an angle α: Figure ( ) In this particular example, the effect is to read too high on the staff. For a typical collimation error of 20", over a sight length of 50m the effect is 5mm. If the sight lengths for back sight and foresight are equal, the linear effect is the same for both readings. When the height difference is calculated, this effect cancels: δh = (b + s. α) - (f + s. α) = b - f That is, the effect of the collimation error is eliminated if sight lengths are kept equal.
This term is used in surveying. 'Height of collimation' means height of instrument.Generally this term is used while doing levelling i.e. Measuring elevation of given point.
_ _ _ _ them all!
you do anything with binary element that is traversing. insertion,deletion, accesing anything.............
Authorization is for authenticating accuracy to eliminate errors or to restrict access.