Ideally, this is done through peace negotiations. However, this is not, practically speaking, an easy task. Incentives, for peace, are often required to be put on the negotiating table so that the alternative to war may be famorably counterbalanced. Even though this does not always work, peace negotiations, often through the strengthening of diplomatic missions and ongoing (hopefully continuous) discussions among the warring parties, can have a positive impact and lead, at least, to temporary (if not permanent) truces.
Making the right decisions.
extreme war debt
To say war solves no problems s simplistic. Probably better to say that other means can be used to solve the problem. Certanly world war ii was solved pretty effectively by war. But most wars are useless bloodfests that only get people killed and don't solve the root cause.
no she did not solve any of his problems
The other countries were really hard on Germany. They wanted the country to suffer and would not give them any breaks.
Because President Roosevelt wanted to fixed his countries problems first(Great Depression). He wanted to continue the New Deal to help solve the problems of his own citizens. He didn't wanna get involved into the war and destroy the economy of the country.
War keeps the world from over populating.
they never did. They lost the war.
Can't help solve problems.
extreme war debt
Anne Frank did not solve any specific problems. She is known for writing a diary during World War II while hiding from the Nazis, which provided a unique perspective on the Holocaust. Her diary has since educated generations about the horrors of war and discrimination.
There is no way of knowing if new technology will solve world problems since we have no way of knowing what new technology is going to be developed, or for that matter, what world problems will exist at the time that technology is developed. It is possible that new technology will be used to solve world problems, and it is also possible that new technology will be used to make world problems worse. We will have to wait and see.
something
it ended the war quickly, at low cost in terms of both money and lives lost on both sides.
i think that politics cause problems but also solve it.take a war for example.when they are all argueing about what to do , people are dying out there.the immediate action is to ,stop the war, NT talk.however , the talk actually manage to allow the fellow organisations to act togerther and solve problems more effectively, thus sloving problems.
cause other countries can't just talk it over and solve their problems
Yes. Personally, I believe that war is stupid. I mean why cant nations solve problems by playing a game of chess, or even basic communication! War shouldnt be the answer.
money problems