He mostly looks down. If he doesnt look down, then hes probibly going to look the other way. Some men have some ways of telling that they are lying
Dr. Smith Denver,CO
There is no way to be certain just by asking. Someone who is lying would lie about telling the truth.The "Liar's Paradox" is that no one can rationally answer a question about the truth by saying "I am lying." This is clearly because if you are telling the truth, you say "I am telling the truth" and if you are actually lying (about lying), you would again say "I am telling the truth" (a lie).If you said you were lying, you would have to be telling the truth, but you're not because you are lying. This is similar to the double-negative paradigm ("He's not right...he's just not wrong").
telling the truth when you have been lying
Of course. If you are dating a girl, and she is lying to you, tell her to tell you the truth, or forget it. It is that simple.
Not telling the whole truth is quibbling--not lying. However, the intent in the quibbler's heart is meant to deceive. So, while you would be quibbling--not lying, you shouldn't tell portions of the truth because it is deceptive and leads people to believe something that they don't know all of.
You refrain from lying to her and tell her the truth. There is no shame in telling the truth.
Not telling the whole truth is quibbling--not lying. However, the intent in the quibbler's heart is meant to deceive. So, while you would be quibbling--not lying, you shouldn't tell portions of the truth because it is deceptive and leads people to believe something that they don't know all of.
Well. "Lying" and "not telling the truth" are not always the same thing. "Lying is where you tell a person something with the purpose to deceive them. You can lie and still tell the truth. Here's an example. Obviously, if I told you the box was red and it really was red and I knew it was red, then I would be telling you the truth and not lying. If I told you the box was blue but it was really red but I thought it was blue, then I would be telling you the truth but I would not be lying. Now if I told the box was blue but it was really red and I knew it was red, then I would be both lying and not telling you the truth. And if I told you the box was blue but it was really red but I thought it was blue, then I would be lying but I would be telling you the truth. To answer your question, lying and being honest are the same things.
"You will hang me." (If they hang him he is telling the truth so they cannot hang him since he isn't lying.
No, he is lying. If he were saying the truth, then, in theory, as he is a chicken, he would be lying. Then, he cannot tell the truth. So, he is lying. But, if he is lying, then all chickens say the truth, and he cannot be lying. The key lies in the word "all". He is lying that ALL chickens always lie, therefore not necessarily all chickens say the truth. It could be that some chickens always lie. The truth does not have to be the opposite. Therefore, he is lying that chickens always lie, and the truth is that "some chickens always lie".
Okay then, but we have one huge problem here. Your question do not make no sense at all. Who is lying, who is telling the truth. Are this words connected that is why you asked this question?
A lie detector is a machine that monitors brain waves and heart rate to be able to tell if a person is telling the truth.
The differences between lying and exaggerating is that when you are exaggerate you can go over board but some of it may not be true. But if you tell a lie then you aren't telling the truth.