to objectively assess subordinates, leaders do the following
Leaders may use performance evaluations, feedback from peers or supervisors, and objective metrics to assess subordinates. It's important for leaders to ensure assessment criteria are clear, consistent, and focused on job performance rather than personal biases. Providing constructive feedback and setting performance goals can also help in objectively assessing subordinates.
It is the leader's responsibility to help subordinates learn by
It is the leader's responsibility to help subordinates learn by
Your responsibility as a leader is to "heat shield" your subordinates. You do this by all of the above
A leadership that the leader leaves decision making to his subordinates.
Step 1: Expedite Learning to Assess the Organization and Your Subordinates
All of the above.
Usually (to his face at least), the Fuhrer (the leader)
Subordinates under a democratic leader would likely perform better in the leader's absence because they feel empowered and motivated to take ownership of their work. In contrast, subordinates under an autocratic leader may lack the initiative or confidence to perform well without direct oversight and guidance. Democratic leaders tend to foster a sense of responsibility and trust among their team, leading to increased performance and autonomy.
This means that a good leader should make decisions based on logic, critical thinking, and sound analysis rather than emotions or personal biases. They should also be able to assess situations objectively and make decisions that are in the best interest of the group or organization they are leading.
Transformational
If you were, just who would you be the leader of ? Leadership depends entirely in the belief of subordinates in your abilities & strengths. And if these followers change their minds then the days of leadership are numbered.ANSWER: Leaders lead the way, if nobody follows this does not negate the path that was forged. Any true leader knows the problems and responsibilities that come with having subordinates. Not all leaders require subordinates and there are leaders who are leaders of leaders and as such do not lead as if he has subordinates but rather leads his peers in the direction all can mutually agree is towards the greater good. Followers are the masses that come after a leader has all ready led the way.