Answer
Embryology does not provide any evidence for evolution. Ernst Haeckel's comparative embryo drawings have been known to be fraudulent for over 60 years although they are still used in some textbooks and by some ardent evolutionists. Embryos are different all through their development. Use of such alleged evidence is at best misleading and at worst is downright deceitful.
Recent attempts to resurrect Haeckel's reputation only serve to show more details of his deceit. One example is how Haeckel deliberately left out the developing "heart pouch" from his drawings of the human embryo.
Second answer
Comparative embryology shows that many different lifeforms go through similar stages of development, which points to common origins. You can read more about this online. Regarding the aforementioned fraud, Robert J. Richards, Professor of the History of Science and Medicine at the University of Chicago, states that the claims are "logically mischievous, historically naive, and founded on highly misleading Photography." For more, see his paper "Haeckel's embryos: fraud not proven."
The Hox genes regulate body plans in embryological development, and are considered one of the primary pieces of evidence for common ancestry of species. Please also refer to the link from Christ's College on the Hox genes for that.
how does adaptations give evidence for evolution?
The basic textbook answer is: embryology, homologous and analogous structures, and fossils. However these are old ideas and don't stand on their own two feet, so to speak, when more research is done into them.
Embryology is used in evolution because its shows a common ansetor. For example, a human and fi sh have similar embryos. Both embryos have pharyngeal slits. In a fish those develop into gills. In humans those turn into our ears.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny, or the development of the individual summarizes the evolution of the species. For example, human embryos go through a stage in which they develop gills as did their aquatic forerunners.
biochemical evidence anatomical evidence fossils vestigial structure embryological evidence
vestgial structures fossils embryology also a big one is that there is a universal genetic code
Part 1: Evidence from the Fossil Record Part 2: Evidence from Geographic Distribution of Living Species Part 3: Evidence from Homologous Structures and Vestigial Organs Part 4: Evidence from Embryology
Monstrous Ajility
how does adaptations give evidence for evolution?
Percy E. Davidson has written: 'The recapitulation theory and human infancy' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Embryology, Evolution, Human Embryology, Human evolution, Ontogeny
biogeography taxonomy morphology physiology genetics embryology ecology evolution from allenwalker
used to prove the analogous homologous characteristics of evolution
The basic textbook answer is: embryology, homologous and analogous structures, and fossils. However these are old ideas and don't stand on their own two feet, so to speak, when more research is done into them.
Embryology is used in evolution because its shows a common ansetor. For example, a human and fi sh have similar embryos. Both embryos have pharyngeal slits. In a fish those develop into gills. In humans those turn into our ears.
I would say geographic distribution.
Indirect evidence refers to information that requires some form of inference or interpretation to establish a connection to a particular fact or conclusion. It does not directly prove a point but rather provides clues or support for a theory or argument. Examples include circumstantial evidence or expert opinions.