usually the word are different
Philosophical questions often focus on deeper concepts such as ethics, existence, and meaning, and have subjective answers that can change over time. Scientific or factual questions, on the other hand, seek verifiable evidence and aim to find objective truths about the natural world through observation and experimentation.
Philosophical questions aim to explore fundamental issues about existence, knowledge, values, reason, and language, often raising more abstract and complex inquiries than ordinary questions. They often lack a definitive answer and prompt deep reflection and critical thinking about the nature of reality and human experience.
The APTA definition of physical therapy outlines the profession's role in restoring, maintaining, and promoting optimal physical function and wellness, whereas the philosophical statement delves into the core values and principles that guide physical therapists in their practice, such as compassion, accountability, and integrity. The definition focuses on the practical aspects of physical therapy, while the philosophical statement delves into the underlying beliefs and ethical framework of the profession.
Philosophy seeks to understand the nature of reality, knowledge, and existence through rational argument and contemplation. It is concerned with fundamental questions about the nature of reality and human experience. On the other hand, science uses empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation to explain the natural world and make predictions about it. Science aims to uncover empirical truths through systematic and replicable methods. Both approaches contribute to our understanding of the world, but they differ in their methods and goals.
Renaissance humanists focused on the study of classical texts and emphasized individualism, creativity, and critical thinking. In contrast, medieval philosopher humanists were primarily concerned with interpreting religious texts and integrating faith with reason in their philosophical inquiries.
Epicureanism and Stoicism both offer philosophical approaches to leading a good life. However, they differ in their views on pleasure and pain. Epicureanism emphasizes seeking pleasure and avoiding pain to achieve happiness, while Stoicism promotes tranquility and acceptance of what is beyond our control to find peace of mind.
Science is focused on "how does this work". Philosophy is more about "but what if" and "why does this".
Demographics and those who studty them may differ, but my vote goes to Spock, as he's been around a lot longer.
answer these questions....
It was in Italian unlike the others which were in Latin.
The enlightenment and the scientific revolution resemble each other in that they both are ways that humans of that time assess their place in the natural world.æ They differ in that one is based on scientific measuresæand one is based on religous or philosophical measures.æ
lol odysseyWare questions.. haha i dont know either :) sorry
In a capitalist system, the government answers the three basic questions.
AnswerLike Taoism, Confucianism is, first of all, an ethical and philosophical system. However, the religious branch of Taoism teaches of the gods, immortals and the afterlife. Confucianism emphasises ancestor worship.
One demerit of using a philosophical approach in the study of political science is that it can lead to abstract and theoretical discussions that may not always have clear real-world applications or relevance. Additionally, philosophical perspectives may differ widely, leading to debates that are often subjective and open to interpretation. Lastly, focusing too much on philosophy may neglect empirical data and practical analysis, which are critical in understanding the complexities of political systems and behaviors.
Example : "Many of the questions written here ask the same thing, and only differ by a word or two."
Not much; it all depends on the income earned by their respective families. See related questions.
The idea of the atom was first proposed by the ancient Greek philosopher Democritus in the 5th century BCE. He suggested that all matter is made up of indivisible particles called atoms, which differ in size, shape, and arrangement.