Without refraction, lenses would not be able to magnify an image.
no.can you please help me?
A standard optical microscope would be sufficient (as opposed to a scanning electron microscope)
It is refraction
Robert hook discovered cell in 1665 with the help of a primitive microscope. He observed it in a cork slice with the help of a primitive microscope. in the shape of a honey comb
gawsh i dno
Microscope works due to refraction.
For an optical microscope, the principle of refraction, in its lenses.
Reflection helps in directing light to specimen and to eye.Refraction help to condense light.
Refraction
It was an extremely simple refraction microscope
I think the a mirror and the Lightning that need to be bright ok
Telescopes, magnifying glass, spectacles, microscope, camera. There are your five things =)
If you wear eyeglasses or contact lenses, then you depend on the refraction of light every minute you're awake and have them on. It's also kind of important if you ever want to use a telescope, a microscope, a magnifying glass, or a camera. To be perfectly honest with you, the eyes in your head could not work without refraction.
It allowed them to observe the cell via direct magnification. Single lenses powerful enough to reach this level of magnification would be impractically large, while small compound lenses can magnify the image using progressive refraction.
What is Refraction?? What is Refraction??
The microscope gave conclusions and observations to the cell theory.
Microscope helps the scientists by magnifying the objects which are not visible to naked eye.