Cable Television
Inventions
Physics
Electromagnetic Radiation

How does satellite tracking allow enhanced microwave body concentration in government radiation experimentation and remote neural monitoring?

User Avatar
Wiki User
2007-12-13 11:00:13

The nature of the question probably means you won't like or

won't believe this answer. This comment because the Mechanic has

fielded questions like this before. The Mechanic is not evaluating

anyone, but has found that some who ask these questions have a

limited concept of the "reality" of the physics that underpins the

answer or they have an unlimited imagination that takes them "where

no man has gone before" and away from the constraints imposed by

technical science and the levels to which we have advanced it. But

you asked and I act upon the honesty of the question. The answer

follows. Microwaves are incompatible with neural monitoring, either

from a distance (remote neural monitoring) or even up close.

Microwaves cannot be used to evaluate neural activity because

neural activity is not something that microwaves can "see" or be

reflected (scattered) specifically from. Additionally, it is

possible that microwave radiation could cause a false firing of a

neuron, but not a specific one and not with any control other than

probability calculated in 3D space and with enough variables to

choke a horse. Lastly, microwaves can destroy neurons if of

sufficient power and appropriate frequency. Again, this happens

according to well defined concepts of microwave scattering, and no

specific neuron can be targeted. Recall that neurons hold

"memories" or hold our "thoughts" in combinations and linkages,

said linkages being with and between specific neurons or neuron

groups. And no neuron or neuron group can be associated with a

specific memory or thought in two different people. (A neuron

might be associated with a specific memory in a

specific individual, but that could only be determined by

direct experimentation on the individual.) The functional

areas of the brain are more clearly defined with each passing year

owing to hard work and the cleverness of the investigators, but

nothing like what is being asked is possible. This isn't Star Trek

or Paycheck (the movie adapted from the short story by Philip K.

Dick) here. The human brain is complex beyond your wildest dreams,

and the marvel of this biochemical machine is best seen in people

who have brain damage or are "defective" in some way or ways. In

these cases, the brain "shifts function" and thought and memory

skew from "normal" areas to reside in adjacent space. This in not

to say that the speech center suddenly shifts to the occipital lobe

or something like that. It doesn't. But we still don't have neural

maps that pinpoint exactly where we store our memory of, say,

colors. As regards the "satellite tracking allow(ing) enhanced

microwave body concentration", try this on: "Gaussian beams are

usually considered in situations where the beam divergence is

relatively small, so that the so-called paraxial approximation can

be applied. This approximation allows the omission of the term with

the second-order derivative in the propagation equation (as derived

from Maxwell's equations), so that a first-order differential

equation results. Within this approximation, a Gaussian beam

propagating in free space stays Gaussian, only that of course its

parameters evolve." In case you missed it, what that is saying is

that a beam of electromagnetic radiation (which microwaves are)

will not stay confined or focused as it travels in free space no

matter how well defined it is at the source. That means the beam

widens as it moves in a vacuum, and it scatters even more in

atmosphere. Resolution fades over distance and even more so with

air to scatter the energy. Nothing as small as a neuron can be

defined by a microwave beam from space, even if the microwave beam

could "see" the neuron, which it can't. Might as well try to locate

the exact position of the electron orbiting a given hydrogen atom

and find its exact velocity at precisely that instant in time. You

asked, and the Mechanic has answered. Let's be clear about

something. Government research programs have unbelievable things

hidden behind the security screens around research labs. And within

the heads of the geeks (really nice guys who are wardrobe

challenged) laboring to iron out the kinks there are things that

are nothing short of astounding. But there are limits on what can

be done. One can bend a light beam around a telephone pole with

fiber optics or other flexible curved optical media or with

mirrors, but one cannot bend light around a telephone pole with

just air. Nothing "they" can do will make this happen. The same

limits on us apply to "them" as well. As an aside, I probably trust

my government as little as you do, but I refuse to let my lack of

trust cause me to think that the laws of physics have taken or will

take the day off. I would not jump from a perfectly good airplane

without a parachute on the off chance gravity would be off on a

break having a smoke. Neither would anyone else, including those

clever people working in black projects.


Copyright © 2020 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.