Some say biotechnology is safe and poses no dangers to humans. Others say there are reasons to believe that there are dangers to humans, such as health issues. Though those who say there are no dangers state that scientific studies show they are safe, those who believe they do pose dangers, question the studies. In short, no one at this point really knows if they do pose dangers, but yes, they could pose dangers to humans.
Rauch makes an intriguing argument: even if biotechnology eventually allows us to "enhance" ourselves in a way that severs our connection with what it means to be human, the results might not be as bad as we might think. Use of these technologies might not spiral out of control as some pessimists fear, but instead might be self-limited:
At its core, the council's fear is that biotech is a slippery slope with no bottom. Yet there are already all kinds of enhancement tools that most people forgo. Cosmetic surgery is readily available and fairly inexpensive. But it remains very much a minority taste, showing no sign of becoming the norm. For that matter, Americans could live longer, look better and even feel happier by exercising vigorously for a few hours a week. Most don't. What is surprising is not how much people will do to make themselves "better than normal," but how little.
. . .Instead of running out of control, biotechnology may be subject to a natural restraining principle, a natural equilibrium. That possible equilibrium is what we call "wellness."
Rauch describes wellness as the condition of not having to think about your health at all. You're neither sick and obsessed with regaining your health, nor are you like a bodybuilder on anabolic steroids who's obsessed with maintaining his "enhanced" condition. Wellness is an equilibrium point that attracts those who lie on either side of it.
If it is true that most humans naturally seek wellness rather than perfection and know wellness when they've got it, then we have much less to worry about than Beyond Therapy fears. Some people, like Michael Jackson, might stop at nothing to "improve" themselves; but those people would remain a minority, more pitied than envied, cautionary lessons rather than exemplars. The distinction between therapy and enhancement would hold for most people, most of the time. In fact, the weird effects of future biotechnological enhancements-which could make Michael Jackson look normal in comparison-might make wellness more appealing than ever. The idea of being better than normal may prove a bigger flop than the Edsel.
Rauch's argument is appealing-- his point about people's unwillingness to excercise is particularly on-target. He may well be correct that even if biotechnology is able to offer us enhancements that alter our understanding of what it means to be a human being, we human beings won't accept the offer.
Before we allow Rauch's insights to make us sanguine about the dangers of biotech, though, we ought to consider the following:
The point of all this may be only that if you're inclined to worry about the dangers of biotechnology, it's not hard to do. I agree with Rauch that we ought to count our blessings for the Council's worrying, since someone, somewhere, ought to be doing it.
Perhaps the only thing that George W. Bush has done right since taking office is to appoint Leon Kass to chair the Concil on Bioethics.
Very often people working in biotechnology do not realize how much harm they can cause by invading and modifying different species.
What do you think life will be of biotechnology has not been introduced in mankind?
Any food that has been modified by biotechnology. For example, many foods are treated for powdery mildew with a product called "Serenade" which contains a living culture of bacteria subtilis....these bacteria make it impossible for the powdery mildew to survive on the host plant.
DDT is a persistent chemical that can remain in the environment for a long time. It has a half-life of around 2 to 15 years in soil and can remain in water bodies for several years. However, the use of DDT has been phased out in many countries due to its harmful effects on the environment and human health.
Examples of Modern biotechnology are tissue culture, genetic engineering, recombinant DNA techniques, mutagenesis, drugs, antibiotics, monoclonol antibodies, antipyretics, analgesics, breeding, cloning etc. Examples of Traditional biotechnology are vinegar, wine, turmeric, spices, food preservation, quarantines, selective plant breeding, hybridization, etc.
pee kar dekh lena
Indeed, the rate of growth of biotechnology in agriculture has been dramatic.
Biotechnology has been very kind. It has been providing methods for the replacement of CFC's.
There are many benefits to using organics. Organic products are ones that have been made without using any pesticides, which means that organic products contain fewer potentially harmful chemicals. As a result, organic products are better for the user and better for the environment.
What do you think life will be of biotechnology has not been introduced in mankind?
Since Chitin is indigestible (insoluble fiber) I can't imagine it being harmful, as long as the shells are cooked enough to kill any potentially harmful thing the raw creature may have been carrying.
The filed of biotechnology today has varied applications. It has been revolutionary in the filed of forensic science. Agriculture industry, dating of old samples, metallurgy, space science are just some of the fields that is been benefited with new innovations in the filed of biotechnology.
The field of biotechnology was first discovered in the late 19th century. The foundation of biotechnology was the discovery of enzymes which are proteins that are used to speed up chemical reactions. The two main branches of biotechnology are: Modern biotechnology which focuses on the use of tools such as genetic engineering and recombinant DNA. Traditional biotechnology which focuses on the use of naturally occurring microorganisms to create products such as beer and cheese.The discovery of biotechnology has revolutionized the sciences and has been used in many industries such as food pharmaceuticals and energy. The first patent for biotechnology was granted in 1978 which is often cited as the year biotechnology was discovered.
Biotechnology is a great thing for the advancement of crops. However, many people are suspicious of it, and so they don't want to buy anything that has been bio-engineered.
The FCC has place a maximum power output for them so that they do not radiate harmful radio waves. Even with prolong use, the cellphone is 100,000 times more safer than a microwave
DNA
Use of genetically modified crops helps us to minimize the use of fertilizers and chemicals so that their harmful effects on environment can be reduced.For example- Bt cotton is produced by a bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt for short). Bt toxin gene has been cloned from the bacteria and been expressed in plants to produced resistance to insects without the need for insecticides; in effect created a bio-pesticide. Examples are Bt cotton, Bt rice, tomato, potato, soybean.corn etc.
chicken is a nonsensical response. biotechnology has existed for thousands of years, albeit often by tradition without an understanding of why combining various elements enhanced or altered a desired effect