Ancient Times: In short, the creation of a nation would result in a large portion of the society to go from nomadic to city dwelling. With the rise of city-states it is likely that Isreal in ancient times served as a political buffer once Rome came to power and possible slowed roman spread into modern day India and Asia diverting Roman interests southward into Africa rather then Asia. In the absence of a strong city-state they may have progressed further rather then diverting energy and resources into maintaining control of that area. Modern Time: With Isreal returning as a nation, the Middle East has become a hot bed of political and ethnic instability revolving around arab acceptance of Isreal and continuing and complex issues involving the Palastinians. This interplay has been a hot bed and rather polarizing topic in the late 20th and early 21st century. The concept of Zionism further complicates it's current existence with it's neigbors and raises questions on the concept of race, culture, and national identity. In addition it sets a percarious precient and topic of discussion on when a nation, society, or group is considered "expired" through conquest or assimilation. If Isreal was conquered and defeated in the past what precident and mandate does a group of people have to restore a defeated or lapsed nation and what measures are acceptable. For instance natives to the British Isles, Native Japanese, Aborigines, North American Tribals (Native Americans or Indians). Those claims of soverignty have been discarded into history but what would prevent the remaining tribe members from revoking the Louisian Purchase and "restoring" their nation? Would violence be permissible? Who decides? Many nations re-emerged for instance after the fall of Roman. The rise and fall of nations in history is a deeply studied topic and Isreal, the former USSR, reunited Germany, and many more continue to fuel debates on the nature of a "nation" and when does a nation "ceases" to be... For a short short short version: "Yes by adding a hell of a lot of drama, complexity, heart break, violence, politics, and regrets to the middle east to everyone in the region."
the course changed because the consequences
he did not change history
swag gratata
Hinduism has been changing constantly. As an example original Hinduism was the culture of Dravidians. It has changed completely throughout the course of history.
yes , i agree with his argument
Yes, of course. He is an ancestor of millions of Asians. He changed the course of history. He had the largest empire of them all. He was a wise ruler. He was the man of the millennium Yes, of course. He is an ancestor of millions of Asians. He changed the course of history. He had the largest empire of them all. He was a wise ruler. He was the man of the millennium
who knows that what im trying to find out
Finding the One Ring.
Of Course. The jews, founders of Israel, at one point in History (Before Jesus) were slaves.
Descendants of the Israelites are called just that; Israelites. Since our Creator changed their ancestor's name to Israel, his descendants have always been Israelites, of course, also being identified with their tribe.
No one can change history. It has happened and cannot be changed. They can however change the course a country takes for the future. Two people that achieved this in Russia were; Vladimir Lenin Mikhail Gorbachev
One of the silvernings could be a) The Creation of the State of Israel, b) the unconditional support of Israel by the US and c) the fact that every Jewish (male or female) is now better off than before WW2. There are of course many more silverlinings...