The deal was to allow California to join the union as free soil, in exchange for Congress agreeing to toughen-up the Fugitive Slave Act, with official slave-catchers hunting down runaways. This aroused the growing Abolitionist lobby, and led to the publication of 'Uncle Tom's Cabin'.
South ofthat line, slavery was allowed. But it only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. When the USA acquired vast new lands from Mexico in 1847, a new compromise had to be worked out, in view of the Wilmot Proviso, which declared that no slavery should be allowed in any of these new territories.
No - there was no slavery in the new territories - California or New Mexico or Utah. Texas was a slave state already.
Slavery in gained territories.
North and South disagreed anyway about extending slavery into the West. The Missouri Compromise (1820)drew a line in the sand - anywhere North of that line, slavery would be illegal. It kept the peace for thirty years.
Utah
New Mexico and Utah
The compromise of 1850, territories were opened to slavery. Utah and new Mexico
Slavery would have been permitted in these territories. (Don't know if it happened.)
Utah and New Mexico
Utah and New Mexico
Utah and New Mexico
Slavery would be legal there. But this did not apply to the new territories that were later acquired from Mexico.
South ofthat line, slavery was allowed. But it only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. When the USA acquired vast new lands from Mexico in 1847, a new compromise had to be worked out, in view of the Wilmot Proviso, which declared that no slavery should be allowed in any of these new territories.
The Compromise of 1850 did not allow any choice in the matter. It reflected the increasing difficulty of creating new slave-states. It was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 that allowed the people of those two territories to vote on the slavery question. The only time it was tried (in Kansas), it led to terrible bloodshed, and was not tried again. The result was that Kansas rejected slavery.
In the Compromise of 1850, the Mexican Cession territory (excluding California) was to become New Mexico and Utah. Their slave situations were to be determined using popular sovereignty, or the power of the votes of the people to decide if it would be a slave state or not. In addition, the Compromise of 1850 also gave the disputed territory between Texas, a slave state, and New Mexico to New Mexico. This invalidated the previous compromise, the Missouri Compromise, which banned slavery in North of 36 in newly gained territory.
Henry Clay
No - there was no slavery in the new territories - California or New Mexico or Utah. Texas was a slave state already.