Dan bums squirrels
Class evidence is the category for most evidence. Class evidence is evidence associated with a group and not a single source. Example: general piece of something (like a paint chip) blood (we can only generalize) Individual evidence is evidence that can be virtually, unambiguously traced to a source. Example: finger prints DNA tool marks (under a microscope) anything torn or broken (must be very specific)
The correct term to use is " there was blood evidence found in the room" if more than one source of evidence i found then the correct term is " there was blood and other evidence found in the room."
class 3
Blood evidence can help to identify the suspect who comitted the crime, (especially in regard to their unique DNA which is found in the blood).
It is not it just simply is not
DNA is classified as circumstantial evidence as there are a variety of scenarios in which the DNA could have been there, say at a popular pub there was a murder, a police man finds some blood on the floor which was not that of the victim; this is not conclusive as the blood could have gotten there a variety of ways.Added: In order to be admitted into evidence, as one of the qualifying exceptions of the "circumstantial evidence" rule, supporting facts and/or evidence must bolster its admission. Something more than mere conjecture must be offered in support of the collected DNA.
Fibers are CLASS evidence. They cannot be individualized to a single person or thing, although there are many types of natural and synthetic fibers.
The only thing taking a gun class is "evidence" of is the fact that (if you passed) that you are now legally assumed to be knowledgeable in the use and handling of firearms.
Class evidence is evidence that can be linked to a group of people rather than individual evidence which can only be linked to one person. Although class evidence can help solve cases, its not guaranteed to solve it. An example of class evidence is if a shoe print is left behind and the only thing they can make of it is the shoe size or make, that would be a class characteristic since many other people may have that same shoe size and make. The shoe print may also be individual evidence due to the fact that not everyone walks the same. If the shoe has wear on a specific part then we can infer that the suspect walks with more weight on that part of there feet.
We cannot identify a person specifically with hair alone. Even if their is mtDNA, it isn't good enough-DNA is class evidence anyway.
The difference is that I only work on math