answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Despite common belief to the contrary there are MANY exception to the hearsay rule. So many, in fact, that this question will have to be worded much more specifically in order to answer it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How is the hearsay rule applied differently in cases of computer related evidence?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is hearsay evidence excluded from the courtroom as evidence?

Hearsay testimony is not admissable.


What has the author Bruce M Botelho written?

Bruce M. Botelho has written: 'Memorandum on hearsay' -- subject(s): Evidence, Hearsay, Hearsay Evidence


Is not admissible evidence in court?

Hearsay


Can hearsay of a habitual violator of a crime say a man with no record of such crime is the guilty party when all evidence is found on violator's property?

No, since the question presumes the evidence is hearsay; therefore it is inadmissible even if the witness had the highest degree of credibility. There are many exceptions to the hearsay rule and many instances where an out of court statement seems to be inadmissible hearsay but is not (i.e. non hearsay hearsay), that it serves no purpose to provide facts that would allow the statement to be used at trial. If the question posed more facts than just the statement that the evidence is hearsay, they would show whether the statement is admissible under an exception or as non hearsay hearsay. Once the statement is admitted as evidence it would be up to the jury to determine if the witness is believable.


What kind of evidence would not be mentioned in an opening statement in court?

Evidence based on hearsay.


How should the appellate court rule when evidence that was submitted is relevant yet inadmissible hearsay?

Hearsay is not evidence, the court rules will not allow it to be heard. As you have stated in your question it is, by definition, INADMISSIBLE.


Can the elements of bribery be proven on hearsay?

No, elements of bribery cannot be definitively proven through hearsay alone. Hearsay involves relaying information that was heard from someone else and is typically not admissible as evidence in court due to reliability concerns. To prove the elements of bribery, direct evidence or corroborating evidence is typically required.


What is wouldn't be found in an opening statement?

Evidence based on hearsay


What is the term for an account by people who didn't witness the event?

Hearsay evidence.


Is non assertive conduct considered hearsay in federal rule of evidence?

No


How the court viewed hearsay evidence of Stroud v Golson?

In Stroud v. Golson, the court found that the hearsay evidence presented was inadmissible because it did not fall within any of the exceptions to the hearsay rule. The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that only reliable and trustworthy evidence is used in legal proceedings to protect the rights of the parties involved.


Law that excludes hearsay?

The Federal Rules of Evidence generally exclude hearsay statements unless they fall within an exception. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, and it is generally considered unreliable evidence due to its potential for distortion or inaccuracy.