by interviewing the witnesses
False
both
both
To be able to consult the data later, to talk seriously with others about the experiment, to compare experiments and results, to support arguments, etc.
The brief layman's answer: Einstein was troubled because his own theories of relativity did not support the idea of a constant universe, the universe that he preferred to believe existed. His equations showed that a steady state universe would eventually give in to the forces of gravity. He developed the cosmological constant, basically a 'fudge factor', so that his theories could support a steady-state universe. Shortly after, Hubble's redshift observations provided evidence that the universe is expanding, and Einstein called the cosmological constant the worst blunder of his life. Ironically, interest in the cosmological constant is returning, as a possible way of explaining the acceleratingexpansion of the universe.
The big bang theory is a useful and effective explanation for the cosmic microwave background, as well as for a number of other observations. Theories are proposed to explain observations. Real scientists don't pull theories out of the air and then go looking for ways to support them. That's not how science works.
Evolution may refer to both the observed phenomenon and the theoretical framework explaining observations in terms of what we know of that phenomenon. Phenomena need no support, just verification. Theories aren't usually supported by other theories, but by observational data. Just so for evolutionary theory: it's supported by the observations in embryology, genetics, comparative genomics, palaeontology, ethology, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, and so forth.
Theories are based on observations and testing. They are widely held to be accurate and form the basis for scientific principles. Theories are upheld by mounting and corroborative evidence. In contrast, a hypothesis is a possible explanation based upon initial observations and an understanding of supporting facts. As observations and tests further support a hypothesis, it becomes accepted within the scientific community and begins to form a theory..
Her own observations and the observations of others
Scientist use scientific methods to test the new theory. They also examine all the evidence to see if it supports the new theory. Scientist accept a new theory when many test and pieces of evidence support it.
Experiments.
use scientific evidence to support your answer
Theories don't support theories.Only evidence that comes from observation or experiment supports or demolishes theories.
There is not enough evidence to support these new theories. More tests and research needs to be carried out before these theories can be proved.
that research and observations support the theorythat research and observations support the theory is the correct answer
A process in which scientists father facts through observations and formulate scientific hypotheses that may eventually become theories.
Inductive arguments