None, they have absolutely none.
WikiAnswers uses trust points to distinguish trustworthy, good contributors from others. Answers from contributors with lots of trust points are often well-written and helpful.
No. Trust points are an indication of how trustworthy the contributions of the contributors of the website are. Higher the trust points, the more trustworthy the contributor is.
A Moral Contributors trust please :D
Nothing really. If you truly deserve them, supervisors and contributors will recognize you!
These contributors are blocked from the site.
Yes it is! I use it all the time! Contributors trust please :D
The WikiAnswers contributors know so much because they learned that much in school and from WikiAnswers.
Whilst this is against the Community Spirit, soliciting for Trust Points does not warrant a warning or banning.
Many contributors have zero trust points, so it would be very tedious to find and list them all.
Probably because not enough WikiAnswers contributors have read your contributions or have considered giving you or others a trust point. I suspect that Supervisors are more likely to attract trust points than other contributors because of the improvements they make to the contributions of others which are likely to then attract a response from the original contributor.
Other registered contributors who like your contributions and think they are helpful. You are unable to find out who gives you the Trust Points, unless they message you to say so.
Trust points are given by the Readers of your answers. Each member can recommend a contributor once. Answers are counted as contributions.