Want this question answered?
anser
it is not known because it may have been started at a time when animal testing was kept a secret
animal testing started in Greek by Aristotle & Erasistratus in the 17th century
There is no alternative. Every day, thousands of peopleare saved from painful diseases. However, we simply do not have alternative methods of testing. Until we have a better system, we must use animal testing.
Well the world doesn't know what exact date animal testing started, but it goes back as far as three-hundred forty something BC.
Proctor and Gamble, the makers of Head and Shoulders, say that 99 percent of their safety evaluations are done without animal testing. The final percent is performed on animals because the law requires it or when there are no other alternatives.
Jamie A. Davies has written: 'Mechanisms of morphogenesis' -- subject(s): Morphogenesis 'Replacing animal models' -- subject(s): Biomimetics, Animal Models, Methods, Animal Testing Alternatives
animal testing started in the years of Aristotle (384-322 BC) and Erasistratus (304-258 BC). & was a very cruel and painful for the animals.
acctually it started in 2005 to 2010
no it is not as bad then animal testing
Some of the arguments for are that it saves human lives, humans are superior to animals and the animals do not know that its happening. Some of the arguments against animal testing are its cruel to animals, animals have rights as well, you should treat animals the same as humans and theres alternatives out there to animal testing. On one side you have the for the other against. The opposing position against probably says it is nessacary for the animal testing because animals are about the same as humans. On the against position animal testing is wrong because it can cause the animal deadly pain and diseases. But I think there should be a human in the place of an animal because animals have feelings.
SUPER EXPTREMLY EXPENSIVE animal testing is the cheapest and most efficiant way