There is no alternative. Every day, thousands of peopleare saved from painful diseases. However, we simply do not have alternative methods of testing. Until we have a better system, we must use animal testing.
Proctor and Gamble, the makers of Head and Shoulders, say that 99 percent of their safety evaluations are done without animal testing. The final percent is performed on animals because the law requires it or when there are no other alternatives.
Jamie A. Davies has written: 'Mechanisms of morphogenesis' -- subject(s): Morphogenesis 'Replacing animal models' -- subject(s): Biomimetics, Animal Models, Methods, Animal Testing Alternatives
no it is not as bad then animal testing
Some of the arguments for are that it saves human lives, humans are superior to animals and the animals do not know that its happening. Some of the arguments against animal testing are its cruel to animals, animals have rights as well, you should treat animals the same as humans and theres alternatives out there to animal testing. On one side you have the for the other against. The opposing position against probably says it is nessacary for the animal testing because animals are about the same as humans. On the against position animal testing is wrong because it can cause the animal deadly pain and diseases. But I think there should be a human in the place of an animal because animals have feelings.
SUPER EXPTREMLY EXPENSIVE animal testing is the cheapest and most efficiant way
Yes, animal testing is around the whole world !
No. There is no legal requirement for animal testing.
well if the testing is from animal haters the animal will die but if they are good it will live......
Yes.In the US, under the Animal Welfare Act and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, any procedure can be performed on an animal if it can be argued that it is scientifically justified.Research facilities are obliged to consider alternatives, ensure the experiments are not unnecessarily repetitive and that adequate pain relief is given (if it will not interfere with the study).
if you believe in animal testing...you have no morals,,,i no this because i just wrote a 5 page paper on animal testing and its horrid
Animal testing sould be illegal because it is harming the animal.