Not very. The 6NZ - the last of the single turbo Cats - was probably the best on-highway engine Cat ever made. Anything after that - MBN, Bridge Cat, and especially ACERT - was junk.
3.2 gallons non turbo, 4 gallons with turbo
Its a six cylinder turbo diesel
Yes, this is possible. However, it involves a significant amount of components and systems not currently in the non-turbo car and it is generally easier, less expensive and more reliable to purchase the turbo car (if one is available).
As an engine turns it sucks air in, which draws fuel with it. In a turbo engine a fan (turbocharger) forces more air into the engine, which draws fuel with it. The more fuel and air that goes into the engine the more power is produced. A turbocharged engine can produce perhaps double the power that a non turbocharged engine produces.
How do you blow a engine turbo.
No, the turbo is powered by the exhaust and uses no engine power.
yes
a non-turbo engine will not hold up to the turbos you will have to put in hardened internals
The 1.8 turbo is more powerfull. The turbo charger pushes more air and fuel into the engine.
no...they are different...it wont fit the block of a non turbo 4d56 engine...
2jzgte (Turbo) or 2jzge (Non Turbo) vvti engine
Well, the turbo charged car has a turbo hooked up to the engine. What a turbo basically does is to force feed the engine with more air + fuel, making it possible to get more power out of a smaller engine.