Want this question answered?
The scientific theory should be changed.
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
No redo the experiment.
i think you should record the results.
Control
The scientific theory should be changed.
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
No redo the experiment.
The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.
similar results should be obtained when the experiment is repeated .
i think you should record the results.
Control
It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven. The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.
A variable is an element in an experiment that you control. There should only be one variable in an experiment or the results will not be accurate.
If you wish to write an essay about a science experiment, you should describe the purpose of the experiment, and the way in which the experiment was performed, and the results of the experiment, and the conclusions that are drawn from those results. If you want to be fancy, you might also describe what further experiments may be needed to continue to explore the subject of the first experiment.
Ambiguous question, but I'll try to give a meaningful answer.In any given experiment, the standard of comparison should not change, but the experiment can be changed if some element becomes evident and the experimenter wishes to explore the unexpected preliminary results.Any elements that are used as a baseline for comparison would be called a control and should not change to prevent the results from becoming meaningless.
The results go against the thinking of society.