Not very. The Royal Navy (of the United Kingdom) had managed to achieve a blockade of Germany and was effectively starving the nation of all resources it could only achieve through importing. France, Britain, and Italy were worn down and hadn't made any geographical progress, but Germany had less manpower and industrial capacity combined. The fuel shortage and harsh winters of 1917 made a severe impact on both sides on the home front, many civilians were killed simply due to being unable to warm themselves. However, with the American declaration it had pretty much sealed victory against Germany and Austria-Hungary. Their conspiracy with Mexico had achieved the worst possible results, Mexico didn't declare war and join the German Alliance but the negotiations had been uncovered with the decoding of the Zimmerman Telegram. Instead of creating a war between Mexico and the US, it had only brought another enemy against them. This only gave the Kaiser the view that the Great War was inevitably lost, with his abdication lesser German politicians were forced forward to assume command and pushed for the peace deal known as the Treaty of Versailles. The Great War wasn't ended because one side militarily collapsed or was defeated, but the idea (rightly or wrongly) that the war could only be lost was strengthened by a number of factors, America joining the war against them being one of the many. A rapidly degrading economic sitation could be seen to be far more dire for the German war effort.
Tanks were meant to break the stalemate of trench warfare
Tanks are huge killing machines. They had not been seen/used before WW1 and were both deadly and psychologically terrifying.
One cause was trench warfare. Both opponents would line up in trenches and if you came over your trench walls you would be gunned down, so there was not really much advancement. Another stalemate would be weapons. Back in WW1 we did not have modern weapons like we do today. For example no planes were used for attacks in WW1 mainly for scouting territory.
tanks helped to break the stalemate that trench warfare created. They were also good at attacking trenches because bullets just bounced off the armour
WW1 started in 1914 and for America it started in 1917 and ended in 1918
The extra manpower brought an end to the stalemate on the Western Front.
Tanks were meant to break the stalemate of trench warfare
Tanks are huge killing machines. They had not been seen/used before WW1 and were both deadly and psychologically terrifying.
The Americans and the British fought against Germany. When the British had reached a stalemate (WW1) or, while still maintaining that stalemate begun to face the prospect of defeat (WW2), American forces entered the war, in both cases years after the initial outbreak of war. Also in both wars submarines were extensively used to cut supply lines between America and Britain.
One cause was trench warfare. Both opponents would line up in trenches and if you came over your trench walls you would be gunned down, so there was not really much advancement. Another stalemate would be weapons. Back in WW1 we did not have modern weapons like we do today. For example no planes were used for attacks in WW1 mainly for scouting territory.
Woodrow Wilson.
my ball sack
tanks helped to break the stalemate that trench warfare created. They were also good at attacking trenches because bullets just bounced off the armour
The Zimmermann Telegram
America.
April 6th, 1917
America--- Christianity Turkey ---- Islam.