The Oxford English Dictionary dates the first appearance of the word vampire in English from 1734, in a travelogue titled Travels of Three English Gentlemen published in the Harleian Miscellany in 1745.[11][12] Vampires had already been discussed in German literature.[13] After Austria gained control of northern Serbia and Oltenia in 1718, officials noted the local practice of exhuming bodies and "killing vampires".[13] These reports, prepared between 1725 and 1732, received widespread publicity.[13]
The English term was derived (possibly via French vampyre) from the German Vampir, in turn thought to be derived in the early 18th century from the Serbian вампир/vampir.[14][15][16][17][18] The Serbian form has parallels in virtually all Slavic languages: Bulgarian вампир (vampir), Czech and Slovak upír, Polish wąpierz, and (perhaps East Slavic-influenced) upiór, Russian упырь (upyr'), Belarusian упыр (upyr), Ukrainian упирь (upir'), from Old Russian упирь (upir'). (Note that many of these languages have also borrowed forms such as "vampir/wampir" subsequently from the West; these are distinct from the original local words for the creature.) The exact etymology is unclear.[19] Among the proposed proto-Slavic forms are *ǫpyrь and *ǫpirь.[20] An older, and less widespread, theory is that the Slavic languages have borrowed the word from a Turkic term for "witch" (e.g., Tatar ubyr).[20][21]
The first recorded use of the Old Russian form Упирь (Upir') is commonly believed to be in a document dated 6555 (1047 AD).[22] It is a colophon in a manuscript of the Book of Psalms written by a priest who transcribed the book from Glagolitic into Cyrillic for the Novgorodian Prince Vladimir Yaroslavovich.[23] The priest writes that his name is "Upir'Likhyi " (Упирь Лихый), which means something like "Wicked Vampire" or "Foul Vampire".[24] This apparently strange name has been cited as an example both of surviving paganism and of the use of nicknames as personal names.[25]
Transylvania, Romania
Since the beginning of time vampires have been seen as demons, going against the rights of humans and feeding on there own. Now a days vampires are seen more like everyone else, more human.
Considering the many types of vampires that there are: some not even humanoid, the beginnings of vampires would seem to pre-date the rise of bipedal humans. It may be that the vampire condition has arisen independently in several orders of animals and therefore has no single or chronologically definite point.
See the related question below.
Homosexuality began wherever life on Earth began.Homosexuality began with the dawn of animal life on Earth.
Vampires do not exist in reality. Any 'existence' they have began when the first vampire story was told.
The notion of silver harming vampires comes from Marvel Comics. From there, it made it's way into popular culture in movies and television. Silver does not affect vampires in the folklore. It doesn't even harm werewolves either for that matter. The use of silver as a weapon against monsters began with the Wolfman film of the early 1940's. Sunlight does not traditionally harm vampires either. That began with Nosferatu (the 1922 silent film).
It is doubtful that Romans could have had legends about "vampires" specifically, because the folklore surrounding the myth began around 1400, long after Rome fell in 476 AD.
are vampires true are vampires true
Some collective nouns for vampires are a vein of vampires or a clot of vampires.
yes vampires are real, bats are vampires. but human vampires are not real
The Asanbosam vampires began at the starting blocks the same as all the other racers. The suggestion that they had a false start is just a vicious rumour.
There is no such a thing as vampires... but there is such a thing as vampire bats. And no, vampires do not have the same powers as Twilight vampires do.
no vampires venom is deadly to animals
None, vampires are vampires, not shape-shifters.
No, only vampires can make new vampires
Of course there are vampires in the Philippines, there are vampires almost everywhere.