answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The family was structured in the same way in both classes, the head of the family was the oldest male. That could be the father, the grandfather, or perhaps ever an uncle. Everybody in one family lived under one roof. Women had no authority exept in the home, old age was honored.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The patricians were the aristocracy. The derived their status from mainly from ancestry and religion. It was said that Romulus, the founder of Rome, selected 100 patres familias (fathers of the family/heads of the household) from the leading clans of Rome at the time to seat in a regal advisory council of elders which was called the senate (from senex, old man). The patricians claimed they were the descendants of these patres (fathers) and called themselves patres. They also monopolised the priesthoods. This was very important because all aspects of Roman private and public life were regulated by religion. Even political procedures were preceded by religious rites. Moreover, in early Rome sacred, private and public laws were undifferentiated. This made the patricians legal experts and thus very influential. It is thought that they were also large landowners. In the early days of the Republic they became the ruling class through what has been called 'the closing of the patriciate.' They closed ranks to exclude other people from power.

The origin of the plebeians and of the word is unclear. Different historians have different theories. There is agreement that it became an important distinction with the closing of the patriciate and with the Conflict of the Order. The word plebeian is similar to the word commoner in that it indicated all non-patricians. It referred to both the poor and members of the rich elites who were excluded from power.

The Conflict of the Orders started with a rebellion by the poor against the patrician-controlled state's refusal to offer protection to debt defauters who were often imprisoned and tortured and sometimes sold a slaves by the rich creditors. Its aim was the protection of the poor and the plebeian tribune was created for this purpose. As rich plebeians became the leaders of the plebeian movement, they used this to press for their access to the offices of state. Eventually they achieved this and were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and they were given equite (cavalry) status, which was the lower tier of the nobility (the patricians were the upper tier). The rich plebeians then turned their back on the poor. The poor just remained poor and their economic grievances (indebtedness and land shortages for small peasants) were not adrressed properly.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The patricians and the plebeians were two social classes in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city, there were only the two free classes with the patricians having the wealth and the political power that came with it, while the plebeians were the poor working class.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

They were the two groups of people in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy ones and the plebeians the less wealthy. Authority was based on wealth, so the patricians had the authority while the plebeians had very little. Once the plebeians revolted and gained their rights, the power and authority also came to them and by the mid to late republic the two groups had little or no differences.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Both patricians and plebeians were the social classes that founded the city of Rome. Both classes were Roman citizens. As the population of Rome grew with immigrants, the patricians and the plebeians became the nobility or the aristocrats, as they were the only two classes that could trace their roots to the beginning of the city.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The patricians and the plebeians were the Roman aristocracy. Both classes could trace their ancestry to the founding of the city.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the differences and similarities between patricians and plebeians?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What were the main differences between patricians and plebeians?

The patricians were the aristocrats and the plebeians were the commoners.


Do the differences exist today that were between the plebeians and the patricians?

The differences between the Plebeians and Patricians were the differences between the rich and the poor. So yes, these differences still exist in all countries all over the world.


What is the differences between the patricians and the plebeians in the roman republic?

The patricians were heads of aristocratic families and the plebians were the common people.


Did the Plebians and Patricians have a war?

No the conflicts between patricians and plebeians did not lead to civil wars. The Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians ended in the mid-3rd century BC. The Roman civil wars stared in the 1st century BC. The civil wars involved a conflict between the populares, a political faction which supported the cause of the poor, and the optimates, a conservative political faction which supported the interests of the aristocracy. They also involved personal rivalries.


Could plebeians be consuls?

Yes they could, "As time went on, there became few legal differences between the plebeians and the patricians. The plebeians could be elected to the senate and even be consuls." Thanks, Unknown


What are similarities between plebeians and patricians?

At the beginning of the city they were different; the patricians were the rich, the plebeians were the poor. Once the plebeians gained their rights, both classes became the aristocracy. Both classes were wealthy. Both classes held seats in the senate and eventually both classes shared the counsulship.


What did a fight between Plebeians and Patricians result in?

they are fighting because the plebeians don't want for the patricians to take over everything. the patricians were to greedy. the patricians and the plebeians fighting over land.


What did many plebeians have to do as rome expanded?

Plebeians had to fight in the army as Rome expanded. Many plebeians refused to join the army because the patricians had more freedom in Rome. This caused a conflict between the patricians and the plebeians.


What was the cause of the struggle of the orders?

friction between the patricians and the plebeians


What was the main cause of the struggle of orders?

friction between the patricians and the plebeians


What are the differences between the plebeians and the patricians?

Plebeians: served in the Roman army that protected the Republic.thought that they deservered both political and social equality with the patricians.Patricians: Didn't serve in the Roman armyDidn't agree that the Plebeians should have equal rights as them.The patricians did serve in the Roman army. They were the officer corps of the early military. They were also the group who were able to contribute arms and armor to the military.


What was the struggle of roman orders?

The main struggle of the orders' central conflict was war.