0
they are fighting because the plebeians don't want for the patricians to take over everything. the patricians were to greedy. the patricians and the plebeians fighting over land.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe cause of the friction between the two classes of people can be summed up in two words: civil rights.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How was equality given to the plebeians?
The plebeians never really achieved equality. The rich plebeians fought for access to the office of the consuls (the two annually elected heads of the republic) and the other offices of state which were created as the republic developed. They eventually succeeded and obtained power-sharing with the patricians. They were also given the status of equite (equestrian), the second highest rank in Roman society. The poor plebeians, instead, just remained poor and socially inferior.It was the result of a struggle between patricians and plebeians which lasted 200 years. It has been termed the Conflict of the Orders. The patrician aristocracy had monopolised power through what has been called the 'closing of the patriciate': it closed its ranks and excluded other elites. The conflict started with a rebellion by the poor plebeians when the patrician-controlled state refused to meet their demand to address the abuse of debt defaulters by creditors. The poor formed the plebeian movement to fight for the economic grievances of the poor. The rich plebeians, who were educated, became the leaders of the movement and used it to gain access to power. Eventually, despite bitter patrician resistance, they succeeded through many agitations and gained access to the offices of state, the senate and some priesthoods.The rich plebeians were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and shared power. The patrician-plebeian distinction with respect to rich plebeians, become politically irrelevant. However, a distinction of rank was maintained. The rich plebeians were given equite (cavalryman status) which was the lower order of the aristocracy. The patricians remained the higher order.It is important to be aware that this process involved only the rich plebeians. The poor plebeians, despite having been the driving force of the plebeian movement, just remained poor and their economic grievances were not addressed properly. When the rich plebeians obtained power-sharing and noble status, they turned their back on the poor. Later on, in the Late Republic, the economic plight of the poor (which was becoming worse) re-emerged as a political hot potato. A new breed of politician sympathetic to the plight of the poor emerged and assumed leadership of the (poor) plebeian movement which became militant again.The plebeians rioted and so the patricians had to give into one of the plebeians main requests. Therefore, the Laws of Twelve Tables were created and hung up in the angora for all to see. On it were twelve laws that applied to both plebeians (the common people) and patricians (the wealthy and upper class). In actuality, the plebeians and patricians never became complete equals.
Why did plebeians not like the government?
The Conflict of the Orders between patricians (the aristocracy) and plebeians (the commoners, both rich and poor) had two strands. It started with a rebellion of the poor plebeians whose grievances were economic, primarily indebtedness, the interest rates of loans and insufficient land for the peasants. The rich plebeians became the leaders of the movement and also had another agenda: power-sharing with the patricians. The patricians monopolised political power by monopolising the seats of the senate and the consulship (the office of the two annually elected heads of the Republic). The poor plebeians rebelled because the patrician-controlled Roman state, refused to meet their demand for protection from defaulting creditors (who were patricians) who imprisoned them, tortured them and sometimes sold them as slaves. At that time the rich ensured labour from the poor through debt bondage/slavery (nexus). The poor were locked into perpetual indebtedness at unaffordable levels so that debt was repaid through labour services. This was a system which lent itself to the abuse mentioned above. During the first rebellion the plebeians created their own assembly to deliberate on their issues (the Plebeian Council) and leaders for their movement (the plebeian tribunes). In the negotiations to end the rebellion, the plebeians obtained the recognition of their assembly and their leaders by the Roman state. The plebeian tribunes were recognised as representatives of the plebeians, but not as officers of state and were not integrated in the patrician-controlled Roman state. The educated rich plebeians became the leaders of the plebeian movement. They used its agitations to fight for power-sharing with the patricians and to gain access to the consulship and other offices of state which were created as the Republic developed and to the seats of the senate. They achieved this and were co-opted into a patrician-plebeians oligarchy. They also were given equite (cavalryman) status. The equites were the second highest rank of Roman society. At this point the rich plebeians turned their back on the poor, whose economic grievances were never addressed properly.
How did continual warfare affect plebeians?
The plebeians had to keep leaving their farms due to being continually forced to fight in wars.
What 3 groups fought for control of the region of Rome?
There were more than three groups. There were the Romans themselves, other Latin cities, the Sabines, the Aequi and the Volsci. At times there were also conflicts between Rome and the nearby Etruscan city of Veii. These were not really fights for control over the region. The other Latin cities and the Sabines fought to check Rome's expansion into the area, rather than to gain control. The Aequi and Volsci settled to the south of Rome and Latium (land of the Latins) and then carried out raids into Roman and Latin territories, rather than fight for control. The only fights over control were the last wars between Rome and Veii. This was a struggle for control over the river Tiber area, rather than for the region. It ended with Rome destroying Veii in 396 BC.
What is the difference between patrician and plebeians?
The Plebs were the general population of Rome. The Patricians were the elite, who originally governed but were progressively replaced in the senate and faded away through attrition in the civil wars, becoming an honorific title.
What did many plebeians have to do as rome expanded?
Plebeians had to fight in the army as Rome expanded. Many plebeians refused to join the army because the patricians had more freedom in Rome. This caused a conflict between the patricians and the plebeians.
Why were the patricians afraid when the plebeians left?
The Patricians were afraid when the Plebeians left because the Plebs took care of everything including the farms. And they were most of Rome's army. If they left then the crops in their farm would wither, and no one would have food. Also if Rome got attacked then there would be no army to fight them back.
Why was it important for not only the patrician's but also the plebeian's to have a say?
The issue was not really about the plebeians having their say. It was a question of the rich plebeians being excluded from political power. This led to 200 years of conflict during which the patricians became unable to exclude other sections of the elite from power. In the early Republic the patrician aristocracy monopolised political power. All the senators and consuls (the two annually elected heads of the city and the army) were patricians. They excluded other elites from power. The plebeians were all the non-patricians, the commoners, both rich and poor. The poor plebeians rebelled several times and formed a plebeian movement to fight for the economic grievances of the poor. Rich plebeians became leaders of the movement and used it to press for access to the senate and the consulship and for power-sharing with the patricians. They obtained this at the end of the 200-year long Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians. They were incorporated into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and were given equite (cavalry) status. This was the lower tier of the aristocracy. At this point the rich plebeians turned their backs on the poor and their economic grievances were not addressed properly.
How did plebeians gain power in the republic and what were they responsible for?
The Conflict of the Orders between patricians (the aristocracy) and plebeians (the commoners, both rich and poor) had two strands. It started with a rebellion of the poor plebeians. The grievances of the poor plebeians were economic, primarily indebtedness, the interest rates of loans and insufficient land for the peasants. The rich plebeians became the leaders of the movement and also had another agenda: power-sharing with the patricians. The patricians monopolised political power by monopolising the seats of the senate and the consulship (the office of the two annually elected heads of the Republic). The rich plebeians used the agitations of the plebeian movement to fight for power-sharing with the patricians and to gain access to the consulship and other offices of state which were created as the Republic developed and to the seats of the senate. They achieved this and were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy. They also were given equite (cavalryman) status. The equites were the second highest rank of Roman society. At this point the rich plebeians turned their back on the poor, whose economic grievances were never addressed properly.
How did plebeians gain power in the republic?
The Conflict of the Orders between patricians (the aristocracy) and plebeians (the commoners, both rich and poor) had two strands. It started with a rebellion of the poor plebeians. The grievances of the poor plebeians were economic, primarily indebtedness, the interest rates of loans and insufficient land for the peasants. The rich plebeians became the leaders of the movement and also had another agenda: power-sharing with the patricians. The patricians monopolised political power by monopolising the seats of the senate and the consulship (the office of the two annually elected heads of the Republic). The rich plebeians used the agitations of the plebeian movement to fight for power-sharing with the patricians and to gain access to the consulship and other offices of state which were created as the Republic developed and to the seats of the senate. They achieved this and were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy. They also were given equite (cavalryman) status. The equites were the second highest rank of Roman society. At this point the rich plebeians turned their back on the poor, whose economic grievances were never addressed properly.
How did Plebeians gain power in Rome?
The plebeians were commoners; that is, non-patricians. The patricians were the aristocracy. The poor plebeians rebelled and created the plebeian movement to fight for their economic grievances which came form their poverty. They created their leaders, the plebeian tribunes. The leaders were rich plebeians who had the education needed to lead a movement. The rich plebeians used the agitation of the plebeian movement for political self-promotion. They demanded access to the offices of state and eventually they succeeded in gaining access to all of them, including the top one, the consulship. Besides using the agitation of the plebeian movement, the rich plebeians also were supported by liberal patricians who favoured the change (conservative ones opposed it). At the end of this process the rich plebeians were co-opted into a patrician-(rich) plebeian oligarchy , and were included in the equite (cavalrymen) rank, which was turned into the lower the of the nobility. At this point the rich plebeians turned their back on the poor plebeians. The conflict between patricians and plebeians had been called the conflict of the orders. Writings of this conflict usually focuses on the process of gaining access to the offices of state. However, it should be remembered that the plebeian movement was meant to be concerned about the economic plight of the poor and that this was never addressed properly.
Why did the plebians leave rome?
The plebeians resented that they we're not treated equally . They could not hold government offices, and their children could not marry the children of the patricians . The conflicts between them led to an assembly for plebeians only called the tribunes which protected them .
How did the plebians eventually gain a larger role in the romain republic?
In the early Republic the patrician aristocracy monopolised political power. All the senators and consuls (the two annually elected heads of the city and the army) were patricians. They excluded other elites from power. The plebeians were all the non-patricians, the commoners, both rich and poor. The poor plebeians rebelled several times and formed a plebeian movement to fight for the economic grievances of the poor. Rich plebeians became leaders of the movement and used it to press for access to the senate and the consulship (the consuls were the two annually elected officers of state who were the heads of the Republic) and for power-sharing with the patricians. They obtained this as well as access the other offices of state which were created as the Republic developed during the 200-year long Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians. They used the agitations of the plebeian movement to obtain this. They were incorporated into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and were given equite (cavalry) status. This was the lower tier of the aristocracy. At this point the rich plebeians turned their backs on the poor and their economic grievances were not addressed properly.
What were the events that led to equality in the roman republic government between plebeians and patricians?
It was a process, rather than an event. It was the result of a struggle between patricians and plebeians which lasted 200 years. It has been termed the Conflict of the Orders. The patrician aristocracy had monopolised power through what has been called the closing of the patriciate: it closed its ranks and excluded other elites. The conflict started with a rebellion by the poor plebeians when the patrician-controlled state refused to meet their demand to address the abuse of debt defaulters by creditors. The poor formed the plebeian movement to fight for the economic grievances of the poor. The rich plebeians, who were educated, became the leaders of the movement and used it to gain access to power. Eventually, despite bitter patrician resistance, they succeeded through many agitations and gained access to the offices of state, the senate and some priesthoods. The rich plebeians were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and shared power. The patrician-plebeian distinction with respect to rich plebeians, become politically irrelevant. However, a distinction of rank was maintained. The rich plebeians were given equite (cavalryman status) which was the lower order of the aristocracy. The patricians remained the higher order. It is important to be aware that this process involved only the rich plebeians. The poor plebeians just remained poor and their economic grievances were not addressed properly. When the rich plebeians obtained power-sharing and noble status, they turned their back on the poor. Later on, in the Late Republic, the economic plight of the poor (which was becoming worse) re-emerged as a political hot potato and the plebeian movement (that is, the movement of the poor plebeians) became militant again.
Why there was a clash between the plebeians and patrician in ancient Rome?
The Conflict of the Orders between patricians (the aristocracy) and plebeians (the commoners, both rich and poor) had two strands. It started with a rebellion of the poor plebeians whose grievances were economic, primarily indebtedness, the interest rates of loans and insufficient land for the peasants. The rich plebeians became the leaders of the movement and also had another agenda: power-sharing with the patricians. The patricians monopolised political power by monopolising the seats of the senate and the consulship (the office of the two annually elected heads of the Republic). The poor plebeians rebelled because the patrician-controlled Roman state, refused to meet their demand for protection from defaulting creditors (who were patricians) who imprisoned them, tortured them and sometimes sold them as slaves. At that time the rich ensured labour from the poor through debt bondage/slavery (nexus). The poor were locked into perpetual indebtedness at unaffordable levels so that debt was repaid through labour services. This was a system which lent itself to the abuse mentioned above. During the first rebellion the poor plebeians created their own assembly to deliberate on their issues (the Plebeian Council) and leaders for their movement (the plebeian tribunes). In the negotiations to end the rebellion, the plebeians obtained the recognition of their assembly and their leaders by the Roman state. The plebeian tribunes were recognised as representatives of the plebeians, but not as officers of state and were not integrated in the patrician-controlled Roman state. The educated rich plebeians became the leaders of the plebeian movement. They used its agitations to fight for power-sharing with the patricians and to gain access to the consulship and other offices of state which were created as the Republic developed and to the seats of the senate. They achieved this and were co-opted into a patrician-plebeians oligarchy. They also were given equite (cavalryman) status. The equites were the second highest rank of Roman society. At this point the rich plebeians turned their back on the poor, whose economic grievances were never addressed properly.
How was equality given to the plebeians?
The plebeians never really achieved equality. The rich plebeians fought for access to the office of the consuls (the two annually elected heads of the republic) and the other offices of state which were created as the republic developed. They eventually succeeded and obtained power-sharing with the patricians. They were also given the status of equite (equestrian), the second highest rank in Roman society. The poor plebeians, instead, just remained poor and socially inferior.It was the result of a struggle between patricians and plebeians which lasted 200 years. It has been termed the Conflict of the Orders. The patrician aristocracy had monopolised power through what has been called the 'closing of the patriciate': it closed its ranks and excluded other elites. The conflict started with a rebellion by the poor plebeians when the patrician-controlled state refused to meet their demand to address the abuse of debt defaulters by creditors. The poor formed the plebeian movement to fight for the economic grievances of the poor. The rich plebeians, who were educated, became the leaders of the movement and used it to gain access to power. Eventually, despite bitter patrician resistance, they succeeded through many agitations and gained access to the offices of state, the senate and some priesthoods.The rich plebeians were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and shared power. The patrician-plebeian distinction with respect to rich plebeians, become politically irrelevant. However, a distinction of rank was maintained. The rich plebeians were given equite (cavalryman status) which was the lower order of the aristocracy. The patricians remained the higher order.It is important to be aware that this process involved only the rich plebeians. The poor plebeians, despite having been the driving force of the plebeian movement, just remained poor and their economic grievances were not addressed properly. When the rich plebeians obtained power-sharing and noble status, they turned their back on the poor. Later on, in the Late Republic, the economic plight of the poor (which was becoming worse) re-emerged as a political hot potato. A new breed of politician sympathetic to the plight of the poor emerged and assumed leadership of the (poor) plebeian movement which became militant again.The plebeians rioted and so the patricians had to give into one of the plebeians main requests. Therefore, the Laws of Twelve Tables were created and hung up in the angora for all to see. On it were twelve laws that applied to both plebeians (the common people) and patricians (the wealthy and upper class). In actuality, the plebeians and patricians never became complete equals.
Roman society consisted of patricians and plebeians why would the patricians want to prevent the plebeians from holding important political positions?
They did not want them to hold any power because they were a class lower than them and they were not as wealthy. And if they did have more power than them they would change the laws to make them have just as many rights as them but what are they...................they were the senate.
