0
They were unique, in that no horrendous atrocities such as the Third Reich had ever happened before.
Hitler's ambitions were to conquer the entire world- he was developing the hydrogen bomb, intercontinental delivery weapons systems, all manner of horrific poison gases, and Goodness knows what else. It took the combined efforts of the rest of the civilised world to destroy his regime and all that it was working for, even if they were ideologically opposed- for example, the USSR was hardly ideologically allied to the Capitalist West, but they knew evil when they saw it, and also knew that there was a difference between political opposites and unmitaigted wickedness. They thus allied themselves with the rest of the world in fighting to defeat Hitler.
The Nuremburg Trials thus saw a 'hybrid court'- some representatrives were from the Eastern Bloc, some were from the Wetsern countries. But they had ALL suffered under Hitler's regime. There were differences as to how the culprits should be punished, and furious arguments broke out regarding what should be done about them, but ultimately, no-one argued that the culprits should be punished or sentenced to death- just HOW they should be
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
The Nuremberg trials were a hybrid court system because they combined elements of common law and civil law legal systems. The trials incorporated both legal traditions to prosecute and try individuals for war crimes committed during World War II. Additionally, the Nuremberg trials introduced new concepts and legal principles, such as crimes against humanity and the responsibility of individuals for international crimes.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was the cost of the Nuremberg Trials?
The cost of the Nuremberg Trials was around $1.5 million. The expenses covered various aspects such as personnel salaries, court proceedings, and logistics.
Who was the US Supreme Court justice who served as the US Prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials?
Robert H. Jackson, who served as an Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court, also acted as the Chief United States Prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II.
This justice served as the chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials of nazi war criminals?
Robert H. Jackson served as the chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war criminals. He was an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Who was the chief prosecuter at the Nuremberg trials of war?
The chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials of war criminals was Robert H. Jackson, an American Supreme Court Justice. He led the prosecution team in presenting evidence against top Nazi officials for crimes against humanity.
The Nuremberg Trials held Japanese war criminals accountable for crimes agenst humanity in violation of the rules of war true or false?
False. The Nuremberg Trials specifically focused on prosecuting German war criminals after World War II, while the Tokyo Trials were held to address the actions of Japanese war criminals. Both trials sought to hold individuals accountable for crimes against humanity and violations of the rules of war.
Did Hitler use Nuremberg trials to persecute Jewish people?
No. The nuremberg trials were held after the war, when several of the officers were take to court for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Who was the US Supreme Court justice who served as the US Prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials?
Robert H. Jackson, who served as an Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court, also acted as the Chief United States Prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II.
How were nazi leaders brought to justice after the Holocaust?
Nazi leaders were not brought to justice during the Holocaust. That is why there was able to be a Holocaust. The Nazi leaders who survived were brought to trial after the war and the holocaust was ended. This was done by trying them in an international court of law before a panel of judges from the major allied countries.
Who was the US Supreme Court justice who oversaw the Nazi trials?
US Supreme Court justice Robert Jackson didn't oversee the trial, but was the Chief US Prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials, which began in November 1945 and concluded in October 1946.
Every president since Nixon has in some way pledged to?
death sentence if they were in same court room with the Nazis during Nuremberg trials
What did Justice Robert Jackson contribute to the Nuremberg Trials?
In 1945, President Harry S. Truman appointed Jackson (who took a leave of absence from the Supreme Court), as U.S. Chief of Counsel for the prosecution of Nazi war criminals. He helped draft the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal, which created the legal basis for the Nuremberg Trials.
What are two types of trials?
Bench trials are when the judge is the decider of fact. A jury trial is where a jury plays that role and determines the verdict.
How is your legal system organized including the difference between trials and appeals and between state and federal court system?
By
The Nuremberg Trials held Japanese war criminals accountable for crimes agenst humanity in violation of the rules of war true or false?
False. The Nuremberg Trials specifically focused on prosecuting German war criminals after World War II, while the Tokyo Trials were held to address the actions of Japanese war criminals. Both trials sought to hold individuals accountable for crimes against humanity and violations of the rules of war.
Where are trials are held and begin?
Trials are held in court.
Why was the atrocities committed by the Japan in World War 2 not tried by international court?
Actually both the Japanese and the Nazis were subject to war-crimes trials at the end of World War 2. These were the "Tokyo Trials" and the "Nuremberg Trials", respectively. These trials were never international courts of law, but military tribunals that were formed by the victorious Allied nations after the war's end. The presiding judges were all military officers from those victorious nations. Generally, non-Asians tend to ignore the Tokyo Trials simply because the Nuremberg Trials got more press at the time. Some of the reasons include greater familiarity with the Nazi war criminals compared to the Japanese war criminals (a common condition within the United States) and a greater identification with, and condemnation of, the Holocaust among non-Asians (which constituted the bulk of the victorious nations. An even simpler reason is that the Nuremberg Trials started first in November of 1945. The Tokyo Trials did not start until April of 1946, about six months after Nuremberg. But perhaps the greatest reason that Nuremberg Trials are more well known the Tokyo Trials is because of controversy. Unlike the Holocaust and the Nuremberg Trials, which more or less remained mainstream topics (or something very close to it) from the end of the war onward, the subject of Japanese War Crimes was turned into a fringe topic for the next thirty to forty years. Even in Japan it was rarely discussed and even when it was, it was considered a fringe subject, not entirely unlike debates regarding UFOs or the paranormal. However, recently the whole subject has been going under some very serious re-evaluation which has in turn raised its media profile. Whether this renewed attention and controversy raises the Tokyo Trials (and the trials that followed it) to the same level as Nuremberg remains to be seen.
What does a trial court have?
Trials.
